Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847907›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2019

Prediction and clinical utility of a contralateral breast cancer risk model.

Daniele Giardiello, Ewout W Steyerberg, Michael Hauptmann, Muriel A Adank, Delal Akdeniz, Carl Blomqvist, Stig E Bojesen, Manjeet K Bolla, Mariël Brinkhuis, Jenny Chang-Claude and 45 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A prognostic nomogram to predict the cancer-specific survival of patients with initially diagnosed metastatic gastric cancer: a validation study in a Chinese cohort.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Tools for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Decision Making.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

55 authors at 20 institutions in 11 countries.

Daniele GiardielloDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ewout W SteyerbergDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Michael HauptmannInstitute of Biometry and Registry Research, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany.
Muriel A AdankThe Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Family Cancer Clinic, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Delal AkdenizDepartment of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Carl BlomqvistDepartment of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Stig E BojesenCopenhagen General Population Study, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Manjeet K BollaCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mariël BrinkhuisEast-Netherlands, Laboratory for Pathology, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Jenny Chang-ClaudeDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Kamila CzeneDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Peter DevileeDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alison M DunningCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Douglas F EastonCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Diana M EcclesCancer Sciences Academic Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Peter A FaschingDepartment of Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of California at Los Angeles, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jonine FigueroaUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh Medical School, Edinburgh, UK.
Henrik FlygerDepartment of Breast Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark.
Montserrat García-ClosasDepartment of Health and Human Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lothar HaeberleDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Christopher A HaimanDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Per HallDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ute HamannMolecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
John L HopperCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Agnes JagerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna JakubowskaDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Audrey JungDivision of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Renske KeemanDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris KramerDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Diether LambrechtsVIB Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium.
Loic Le MarchandUniversity of Hawaii Cancer Center, Epidemiology Program, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Annika LindblomDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jan LubińskiDepartment of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Mehdi ManoochehriMolecular Genetics of Breast Cancer, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Luigi MarianiUnit of Clinical Epidemiology and Trial Organization, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
Heli NevanlinnaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Hester S A OldenburgDepartment of Surgical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Saskia PeldersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Paul D P PharoahCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Mitul ShahCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sabine SieslingDepartment of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Vincent T H B M SmitDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Melissa C SoutheyPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
William J TapperFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Rob A E M TollenaarDepartment of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alexandra J van den BroekDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carolien H M van DeurzenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Flora E van LeeuwenDivision of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066, CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Chantal van OngevalLeuven Multidisciplinary Breast Center, Department of Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Laura J Van't VeerDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Qin WangCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Camilla WendtDepartment of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pieter J WestenendBOOG, Laboratory for Pathology Dordrecht, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Maartje J HooningDepartment of Medical Oncology, Family Cancer Clinic, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marjanka K SchmidtDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. mk.schmidt@nki.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GBErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLHeidelberg University · DEGentofte Hospital · DKKU Leuven · BEPomeranian Medical University · PLStockholm South General Hospital · SEUniversity of Southampton · GBComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen · DEFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITInstitute of Cancer Research · GBKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEMonash University · AUNetherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NLÖrebro University Hospital · SEThales (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

Breast Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA164920 · NCI · CANCER PREVENTION INSTIT OF CALIFORNIA · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE, BUYS, SAUNDRA S · 2012 to 2017
$12.7M
Cancer Research UK 10118Cancer Research UK 10124Cancer Research UK 16561Cancer Research UK 16563Cancer Research UK C1275/A11699Cancer Research UK C1275/A15956Cancer Research UK C1275/A19187Cancer Research UK C1275/C22524Cancer Research UK C1287/A10118Cancer Research UK C1287/A16563Cancer Research UK C490/A10124Cancer Research UK C490/A16561NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer survivors are at risk for contralateral breast cancer (CBC), with the consequent burden of further treatment and potentially less favorable prognosis. We aimed to develop and validate a CBC risk prediction model and evaluate its applicability for clinical decision-making.

methodsWe included data of 132,756 invasive non-metastatic breast cancer patients from 20 studies with 4682 CBC events and a median follow-up of 8.8 years. We developed a multivariable Fine and Gray prediction model (PredictCBC-1A) including patient, primary tumor, and treatment characteristics and BRCA1/2 germline mutation status, accounting for the competing risks of death and distant metastasis. We also developed a model without BRCA1/2 mutation status (PredictCBC-1B) since this information was available for only 6% of patients and is routinely unavailable in the general breast cancer population. Prediction performance was evaluated using calibration and discrimination, calculated by a time-dependent area under the curve (AUC) at 5 and 10 years after diagnosis of primary breast cancer, and an internal-external cross-validation procedure. Decision curve analysis was performed to evaluate the net benefit of the model to quantify clinical utility.

resultsIn the multivariable model, BRCA1/2 germline mutation status, family history, and systemic adjuvant treatment showed the strongest associations with CBC risk. The AUC of PredictCBC-1A was 0.63 (95% prediction interval (PI) at 5 years, 0.52-0.74; at 10 years, 0.53-0.72). Calibration-in-the-large was -0.13 (95% PI: -1.62-1.37), and the calibration slope was 0.90 (95% PI: 0.73-1.08). The AUC of Predict-1B at 10 years was 0.59 (95% PI: 0.52-0.66); calibration was slightly lower. Decision curve analysis for preventive contralateral mastectomy showed potential clinical utility of PredictCBC-1A between thresholds of 4-10% 10-year CBC risk for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and non-carriers.

conclusionsWe developed a reasonably calibrated model to predict the risk of CBC in women of European-descent; however, prediction accuracy was moderate. Our model shows potential for improved risk counseling, but decision-making regarding contralateral preventive mastectomy, especially in the general breast cancer population where limited information of the mutation status in BRCA1/2 is available, remains challenging.

Indexed as

Area Under CurveBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsClinical Decision-MakingDisease ManagementDisease SusceptibilityFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansNeoplasms, Second PrimaryNetherlandsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanBRCA mutation carriersClinical decision-makingContralateral breast cancerRisk prediction model

Identifiers

PMID31847907
PMCPMC6918633
OpenAlexW2995992672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.