Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847867›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2019

Circular economy and environmental health in low- and middle-income countries.

Caradee Y Wright, Linda Godfrey, Giovanna Armiento, Lorren K Haywood, Roula Inglesi-Lotz, Katrina Lyne, Patricia Nayna Schwerdtle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caradee Y WrightEnvironment and Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, 1 Soutpansberg Road, Pretoria, South Africa. cwright@mrc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0001-9608-818X
Linda GodfreyCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa.
Giovanna ArmientoENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Rome, Italy.
Lorren K HaywoodCouncil for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria, South Africa.
Roula Inglesi-LotzDepartment of Economics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Katrina LyneIndependant consultant, Adelaide, Australia.
Patricia Nayna SchwerdtleMonash University, Nursing and Midwifery, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe circular economy framework for human production and consumption is an alternative to the traditional, linear concept of 'take, make, and dispose'. Circular economy (CE) principles comprise of 'design out waste and pollution', 'retain products and materials in use', and 'regenerate natural systems'. This commentary considers the risks and opportunities of the CE for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), acknowledging that LMICs must identify their own opportunities, while recognising the potential positive and negative environmental health impacts. MAIN BODY: The implementation of the CE in LMICs is mostly undertaken informally, driven by poverty and unemployment. Activities being employed towards extracting value from waste in LMICs are imposing environmental health risks including exposure to hazardous and toxic working environments, emissions and materials, and infectious diseases. The CE has the potential to aid towards the achievement of the SDGs, in particular SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities). However, since SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-Being) is critical in the pursuit of all SDGs, the negative implications of the CE should be well understood and addressed. We call on policy makers, industry, the health sector, and health-determining sectors to address these issues by defining mechanisms to protect vulnerable populations from the negative health impacts that may arise in LMICs as these countries domesticate the CE.

conclusionStriving towards a better understanding of risks should not undermine support for the CE, which requires the full agency of the public and policy communities to realise the potential to accelerate LMICs towards sustainable production and consumption, with positive synergies for several SDGs.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesEnvironmental HealthHumansSustainable DevelopmentCircular economyEnvironmental healthLow-and-middle-income countriesSustainable consumptionSustainable development goalsSustainable production

Identifiers

PMID31847867
PMCPMC6918643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.