Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847865›Full record

ArticleGlobalization and health2019

Systems approaches for localising the SDGs: co-production of place-based case studies.

David T Tan, José Gabriel Siri, Yi Gong, Benjamin Ong, Shiang Cheng Lim, Brian H MacGillivray, Terry Marsden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Globalization and health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

David T TanInternational Institute for Global Health, United Nations University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. d.tan@unu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-4820-2878
José Gabriel SiriInternational Institute for Global Health, United Nations University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Yi GongSustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK. gongy2@cardiff.ac.uk.
Benjamin OngUrban Biodiversity Initiative, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Shiang Cheng LimInternational Institute for Global Health, United Nations University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Brian H MacGillivraySustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Terry MarsdenSustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
United Nations University-International Institute for Global Health · MYCardiff University · GBUniversity of Wales Institute Cardiff · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocalisation is a pervasive challenge in achieving sustainable development. Contextual particularities may render generalized strategies to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) unfeasible, impractical, or ineffective. Furthermore, many localities are resource- and data-poor, limiting applicability of the global SDG indicator framework. Tools to enable local actors to make sense of complex problems, communicate this understanding, and act accordingly hold promise in their ability to improve results.

aimSystems approaches can help characterise local causal systems, identify useful leverage points, and foster participation needed to localise and catalyse development action. Critically, such efforts must be deeply rooted in place, involving local actors in mapping decision-processes and causation within local physical, social and policy environments. Given that each place has a unique geographical or spatial extent and therein lies its unique characters and problems, we term these activities "placially explicit." We describe and reflect on a process used to develop placially explicit, systems-based (PESB) case studies on issues that intersect with and impact urban health and wellbeing, addressing the perspectives of various actors to produce place-based models and insights that are useful for SDG localisation.

methodsSeven case studies were co-produced by one or more Partners with place-based knowledge of the case study issue and a Systems Thinker. In each case, joint delineation of an appropriate framing was followed by iterative dialogue cycles to uncover key contextual factors, with attention to institutional and societal structures and paradigms and the motivations and constraints of other actors. Casual loop diagrams (CLDs) were iteratively developed to capture complex narratives in a simple visual way.

resultsCase study development facilitated transfer of local knowledge and development of systems thinking capacity. Partners reported new insights, including a shifting of problem frames and corresponding solution spaces to higher systems levels. Such changes led partners to re-evaluate their roles and goals, and thence to new actions and strategies. CLD-based narratives also proved useful in ongoing communications.

conclusionCo-production of PESB case studies are a useful component of transdisciplinary toolsets for local SDG implementation, building the capacity of local actors to explore complex problems, identify new solutions and indicators, and understand the systemic linkages inherent in SDG actions across sectors and scales.

Indexed as

Sustainable DevelopmentSystems AnalysisCase-Control StudiesHumansCo-productionLocalisationPlace-based approachesPlacially explicitSDGsSystems approachesSystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID31847865
PMCPMC6918641
OpenAlexW2994893967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.