Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847845›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2019

Horizontal transfer and finalization of a reliable detection method for the olive fruit fly endosymbiont, Candidatus Erwinia dacicola.

Gaia Bigiotti, Roberta Pastorelli, Roberto Guidi, Antonio Belcari, Patrizia Sacchetti

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gaia BigiottiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Maragliano 77, 50144, Florence, Italy. gaia.bigiotti@unifi.it.
Roberta PastorelliResearch Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CREA-AA), via di Lanciola, 12/A, 50125, Florence, Italy.
Roberto GuidiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Maragliano 77, 50144, Florence, Italy.
Antonio BelcariDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Maragliano 77, 50144, Florence, Italy.
Patrizia SacchettiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Maragliano 77, 50144, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe olive fly, Bactrocera oleae, is the most important insect pest in olive production, causing economic damage to olive crops worldwide. In addition to extensive research on B. oleae control methods, scientists have devoted much effort in the last century to understanding olive fly endosymbiosis with a bacterium eventually identified as Candidatus Erwinia dacicola. This bacterium plays a relevant role in olive fly fitness. It is vertically transmitted, and it benefits both larvae and adults in wild populations; however, the endosymbiont is not present in lab colonies, probably due to the antibiotics and preservatives required for the preparation of artificial diets. Endosymbiont transfer from wild B. oleae populations to laboratory-reared ones allows olive fly mass-rearing, thus producing more competitive flies for future Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) applications.

resultsWe tested the hypothesis that Ca. E. dacicola might be transmitted from wild, naturally symbiotic adults to laboratory-reared flies. Several trials have been performed with different contamination sources of Ca. E. dacicola, such as ripe olives and gelled water contaminated by wild flies, wax domes containing eggs laid by wild females, cages dirtied by faeces dropped by wild flies and matings between lab and wild adults. PCR-DGGE, performed with the primer set 63F-GC/518R, demonstrated that the transfer of the endosymbiont from wild flies to lab-reared ones occurred only in the case of cohabitation.

conclusionsCohabitation of symbiotic wild flies and non-symbiotic lab flies allows the transfer of Ca. E. dacicola through adults. Moreover, PCR-DGGE performed with the primer set 63F-GC/518R was shown to be a consistent method for screening Ca. E. dacicola, also showing the potential to distinguish between the two haplotypes (htA and htB). This study represents the first successful attempt at horizontal transfer of Ca. E. dacicola and the first step in acquiring a better understanding of the endosymbiont physiology and its relationship with the olive fly. Our research also represents a starting point for the development of a laboratory symbiotic olive fly colony, improving perspectives for future applications of the Sterile Insect Technique.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryDNA, BacterialErwiniaFemaleInsect ControlLarvaMaleOleaSexual Behavior, AnimalSymbiosisTephritidaeDNA, BacterialARDRABactrocera oleaeDGGEEndosymbiontOesophageal bulbSIT

Identifiers

PMID31847845
PMCPMC6918556
OpenAlexW2995022817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.