Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847839›Full record

ArticleBMC biotechnology2019

Olive fruit fly rearing procedures affect the vertical transmission of the bacterial symbiont Candidatus Erwinia dacicola.

Patrizia Sacchetti, Roberta Pastorelli, Gaia Bigiotti, Roberto Guidi, Sara Ruschioni, Carlo Viti, Antonio Belcari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrizia SacchettiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Maragliano 77, 50144, Florence, Italy. patrizia.sacchetti@unifi.it.
Roberta PastorelliResearch Centre for Agriculture and Environment, Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CREA-AA), via di Lanciola, 12/A, 50125, Florence, Italy.
Gaia BigiottiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Maragliano 77, 50144, Florence, Italy.
Roberto GuidiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Maragliano 77, 50144, Florence, Italy.
Sara RuschioniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Via Brecce Bianche 10, 60131, Ancona, Italy.
Carlo VitiDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Maragliano 77, 50144, Florence, Italy.
Antonio BelcariDepartment of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI), University of Florence, via Maragliano 77, 50144, Florence, Italy.
University of Florence · ITConsiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria · ITMarche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe symbiosis between the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae, and Candidatus Erwinia dacicola has been demonstrated as essential for the fly's larval development and adult physiology. The mass rearing of the olive fruit fly has been hindered by several issues, including problems which could be related to the lack of the symbiont, presumably due to preservatives and antibiotics currently used during rearing under laboratory conditions. To better understand the mechanisms underlying symbiont removal or loss during the rearing of lab colonies of the olive fruit fly, we performed experiments that focused on bacterial transfer from wild female flies to their eggs. In this research, eggs laid by wild females were treated with propionic acid solution, which is often used as an antifungal agent, a mixture of sodium hypochlorite and Triton X, or water (as a control). The presence of the bacterial symbiont on eggs was evaluated by real-time PCR and scanning electron microscopy.

resultsDGGE analysis showed a clear band with the same migration behavior present in all DGGE profiles but with a decreasing intensity. Molecular analyses performed by real-time PCR showed a significant reduction in Ca. E. dacicola abundance in eggs treated with propionic acid solution or a mixture of sodium hypochlorite and Triton X compared to those treated with water. In addition, the removal of bacteria from the surfaces of treated eggs was highlighted by scanning electron microscopy.

conclusionsThe results clearly indicate how the first phases of the colony-establishment process are important in maintaining the symbiont load in laboratory populations and suggest that the use of products with antimicrobial activity should be avoided. The results also suggest that alternative rearing procedures for the olive fruit fly should be investigated.

Indexed as

AnimalsErwiniaFemaleMaleMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningOctoxynolOleaOvumPropionatesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSexual Behavior, AnimalSodium HypochloriteSymbiosisTephritidaeOctoxynolPropionatespropionic acidSodium HypochloriteBactrocera oleaeDGGEDisinfectantEgg morphologyInsect rearingPropionic acidReal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID31847839
PMCPMC6918546
OpenAlexW2996503668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.