Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847830›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2019

SPAR - a randomised, placebo-controlled phase II trial of simvastatin in addition to standard chemotherapy and radiation in preoperative treatment for rectal cancer: an AGITG clinical trial.

Michael B Jameson, Kirsten Gormly, David Espinoza, Wendy Hague, Gholamreza Asghari, Grahame Mark Jeffery, Timothy Jay Price, Christos Stelios Karapetis, Michael Arendse, James Armstrong and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Statin as a therapeutic agent in gastroenterological cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael B JamesonWaikato Hospital and Waikato Clinical Campus, University of Auckland, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Kirsten GormlyDr Jones & Partners, Eastwood, SA, Australia.
David EspinozaNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Wendy HagueNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Gholamreza AsghariBankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, Australia.
Grahame Mark JefferyChristchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Timothy Jay PriceQueen Elizabeth Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Christos Stelios KarapetisFlinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Michael ArendseWaikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand.
James ArmstrongConsumer Advisory Panel, Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, Sydney, Australia.
John ChildsRegional Cancer and Blood Centre, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.
Frank A FrizelleCanterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Sam NganPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
Andrew StevensonRoyal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.
Martinus OostendorpNHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Stephen P AcklandUniversity of Newcastle, Lake Macquarie Private Hospital and Calvary Mater Newcastle Hospital, Newcastle, Australia. stephen.ackland@newcastle.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5303-0017
The University of Sydney · AUAuckland District Health Board · NZBankstown Lidcombe Hospital · AUCanterbury District Health Board · NZChristchurch Hospital · NZFlinders University · AULake Macquarie Private Hospital · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUQueen Elizabeth Hospital · AURoyal Brisbane and Women's Hospital · AUUniversity of Auckland · NZWaikato Hospital · NZ

Funding

CLINICAL ONCOLOGY RESEARCH TRAININGK12CA001707 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI TAETLE, RAYMOND M · 1992 to 1996
–
Cancer Australia APP1125958Cancer Council NSW APP1125958, RG 17-07New Zealand Health Research Council 18/233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetrospective studies show improved outcomes in colorectal cancer patients if taking statins, including overall survival, pathological response of rectal cancer to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT), and reduced acute and late toxicities of pelvic radiation. Major tumour regression following pCRT has strong prognostic significance and can be assessed in vivo using MRI-based tumour regression grading (mrTRG) or after surgery using pathological TRG (pathTRG).

methodsA double-blind phase 2 trial will randomise 222 patients planned to receive long-course fluoropyrimidine-based pCRT for rectal adenocarcinoma at 18+ sites in New Zealand and Australia. Patients will receive simvastatin 40 mg or placebo daily for 90 days starting 1 week prior to standard pCRT. Pelvic MRI 6 weeks after pCRT will assess mrTRG grading prior to surgery. The primary objective is rates of favourable (grades 1-2) mrTRG following pCRT with simvastatin compared to placebo, considering mrTRG in 4 ordered categories (1, 2, 3, 4-5). Secondary objectives include comparison of: rates of favourable pathTRG in resected tumours; incidence of toxicity; compliance with intended pCRT and trial medication; proportion of patients undergoing surgical resection; cancer outcomes and pathological scores for radiation colitis. Tertiary objectives include: association between mrTRG and pathTRG grouping; inter-observer agreement on mrTRG scoring and pathTRG scoring; studies of T-cell infiltrates in diagnostic biopsies and irradiated resected normal and malignant tissue; and the effect of simvastatin on markers of systemic inflammation (modified Glasgow prognostic score and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio). Trial recruitment commenced April 2018. DISCUSSION: When completed this study will be able to observe meaningful differences in measurable tumour outcome parameters and/or toxicity from simvastatin. A positive result will require a larger RCT to confirm and validate the merit of statins in the preoperative management of rectal cancer. Such a finding could also lead to studies of statins in conjunction with chemoradiation in a range of other malignancies, as well as further exploration of possible mechanisms of action and interaction of statins with both radiation and chemotherapy. The translational substudies undertaken with this trial will provisionally explore some of these possible mechanisms, and the tissue and data can be made available for further investigations.

trial registrationANZ Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12617001087347. (www.anzctr.org.au, registered 26/7/2017) Protocol Version: 1.1 (June 2017).

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsRectal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm GradingPreoperative CareRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSimvastatinTreatment OutcomeSimvastatinChemoradiationHMG-coA reductase inhibitorRectal cancerStatinsTumour regression grading

Identifiers

PMID31847830
PMCPMC6918635
OpenAlexW2995364598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.