ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2019
Fitness consequences of a non-recombining
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel stressors and trait variation determine X-linked meiotic drive frequency.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Modeling the evolution of Schizosaccharomyces pombe populations with multiple killer meiotic drivers.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2024Article
- Non-Mendelian transmission of X chromosomes: mechanisms and impact on sex ratios and population dynamics in different breeding systems.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024Review
- Inter- and intraspecific variation in mycotoxin tolerance: A study of fourEcology and evolution · 2022Article
- Diverse mating phenotypes impact the spread ofeLife · 2021Article
- Linked supergenes underlie split sex ratio and social organization in an ant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Article
- Selfish genetic elements and male fertility.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020Review
- Polyandry blocks gene drive in a wild house mouse population.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Adequacy and sufficiency evaluation of existing EFSA guidelines for the molecular characterisation, environmental risk assessment and post-market environmental monitoring of genetically modified insects containing engineered gene drives.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
- Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2020Review
- Fitness consequences of a non-recombiningProceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Gene drive: progress and prospects.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding the pleiotropic consequences of gene drive systems on host fitness is essential to predict their spread through a host population. Here, we study
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.