Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847490›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Challenges in Managing Acute Cardiovascular Diseases and Follow Up Care in Rural Areas: A Narrative Review.

Sandra C Thompson, Lee Nedkoff, Judith Katzenellenbogen, Mohammad Akhtar Hussain, Frank Sanfilippo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Post-Intensive Care Fragmentation Among Rural Veterans: Transitions Between VA and Community Health Systems.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra C ThompsonWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 109, Geraldton 6531, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0327-7155
Lee NedkoffSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, M431, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Australia.
Judith KatzenellenbogenSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, M431, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Australia.
Mohammad Akhtar HussainWestern Australian Centre for Rural Health, The University of Western Australia, P.O. Box 109, Geraldton 6531, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6012-3702
Frank SanfilippoSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, M431, 35 Stirling Highway, Perth 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3639-0787
The University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This narrative review explores relevant literature that is related to the challenges in implementing evidence-based management for clinicians in rural and remote areas, while primarily focussing on management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and follow up care. A targeted literature search around rural/urban differences in the management of ACS, cardiovascular disease, and cardiac rehabilitation identified multiple issues that are related to access, including the ability to pay, transport and geographic distances, delays in patients seeking care, access to diagnostic testing, and timely treatment in an appropriate facility. Workforce shortages or lack of ready access to relevant expertise, cultural differences, and complexity that arises from comorbidities and from geographical isolation amplified diagnostic challenges. Given the urgency in management of ACS, rural clinicians must act quickly to achieve optimal patient outcomes. New technologies and quality improvement approaches enable better access to rapid diagnosis, as well as specialist input and care. Achieving an uptake of cardiac rehabilitation in rural and remote settings poses challenges that may reduce with the use of alternative models to centre-based rehabilitation and use of modern technologies. Expediting improvement in cardiovascular outcomes and reducing rural disparities requires system changes and that clinicians embrace attention to prevention, emergency management, and follow up care in rural contexts.

Indexed as

AftercareAcute DiseaseCardiovascular DiseasesHospitals, RuralHumansQuality of Health CareRural Health ServicesRural Populationaccessacute coronary syndromecardiac rehabilitationcardiovascularoutcomespreventionprimary careremoterevascularizationreviewruralworkforce

Identifiers

PMID31847490
PMCPMC6950682
OpenAlexW2996291505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.