ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Non-Invasive Continuous Blood-Pressure Monitoring Models Based on Photoplethysmography and Electrocardiography.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Methods for the Prediction of Intraoperative Hypotension with Biosignal Waveforms.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- Validation of a New Ankle Brachial Index Measurement System Using Pulse Wave Velocity.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Assessing hemodynamics from the photoplethysmogram to gain insights into vascular age: a review from VascAgeNet.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2022Review
- Non-Invasive Hemodynamics Monitoring System Based on Electrocardiography via Deep Convolutional Autoencoder.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Harnessing the Power of Smart and Connected Health to Tackle COVID-19: IoT, AI, Robotics, and Blockchain for a Better World.IEEE internet of things journal · 2021Article
- Perspective on the increasing role of optical wearables and remote patient monitoring in the COVID-19 era and beyond.Journal of biomedical optics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blood pressure is an extremely important blood hemodynamic parameter. The pulse wave contains abundant blood-pressure information, and the convenience and non-invasivity of its measurement make it ideal for non-invasive continuous monitoring of blood pressure. Based on combined photoplethysmography and electrocardiogram signals, this study aimed to extract the waveform information, introduce individual characteristics, and construct systolic and diastolic blood-pressure (SBP and DBP) estimation models using the back-propagation error (BP) neural network. During the model construction process, the mean impact value method was employed to investigate the impact of each feature on the model output and reduce feature redundancy. Moreover, the multiple population genetic algorithm was applied to optimize the BP neural network and determine the initial weights and threshold of the network. Finally, the models were integrated for further optimization to generate the final individualized continuous blood-pressure monitoring models. The results showed that the predicted values of the model in this study correlated significantly with the measured values of the electronic sphygmomanometer. The estimation errors of the model met the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) criteria (the SBP error was 2.5909 ± 3.4148 mmHg, and the DBP error was 2.6890 ± 3.3117 mmHg) and the Grade A British Hypertension Society criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.