Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847467›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Neurocognitive Mechanism of Human Resilience: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Review.

Zai-Fu Yao, Shulan Hsieh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cognitive Correlates of Resilience in Adults Experiencing Homelessness.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Considerations toward an epigenetic and common pathways theory of mental disorder.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Post-Traumatic Growth and Resilience among Hospitalized COVID-19 Survivors: A Gendered Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zai-Fu YaoBrain and Cognition, Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9823-9110
Shulan HsiehCognitive Electrophysiology Laboratory: Control, Aging, Sleep, & Emotion (CASE), National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resilience is an innate human capacity that holds the key to uncovering why some people rebound after trauma and others never recover. Various theories have debated the mechanisms underlying resilience at the psychological level but have not yet incorporated neurocognitive concepts/findings. In this paper, we put forward the idea that cognitive flexibility moderates how well people adapt to adverse experiences, by shifting attention resources between cognition-emotion regulation and pain perception. We begin with a consensus on definitions and highlight the role of cognitive appraisals in mediating this process. Shared concepts among appraisal theories suggest that cognition-emotion, as well as pain perception, are cognitive mechanisms that underlie how people respond to adversity. Frontal brain circuitry sub-serves control of cognition and emotion, connecting the experience of physical pain. This suggests a substantial overlap between these phenomena. Empirical studies from brain imaging support this notion. We end with a discussion of how the role of the frontal brain network in regulating human resilience, including how the frontal brain network interacts with cognition-emotion-pain perception, can account for cognitive theories and why cognitive flexibilities' role in these processes can create practical applications, analogous to the resilience process, for the recovery of neural plasticity.

Indexed as

CognitionEmotionsPain PerceptionResilience, PsychologicalAnimalsBrainHumansadaptive behavioradversitycognitive flexibilityresiliencestress

Identifiers

PMID31847467
PMCPMC6950690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.