Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847402›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2019

Cold Adapted

Tina Sanders, Claudia Fiencke, Jennifer Hüpeden, Eva Maria Pfeiffer, Eva Spieck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tina SandersHelmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Institut für Küstenforschung, Max-Planck-Str. 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3692-1800
Claudia FienckeUniversität Hamburg, Institut für Bodenkunde, Allende-Platz 2, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Jennifer HüpedenUniversität Hamburg, Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie, Ohnhorststr. 18, 22609 Hamburg, Germany.
Eva Maria PfeifferUniversität Hamburg, Institut für Bodenkunde, Allende-Platz 2, 20146 Hamburg, Germany.
Eva SpieckUniversität Hamburg, Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie, Ohnhorststr. 18, 22609 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4390-6086

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CLISAP
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Permafrost-affected landscape soils are rich in organic matter and contain a high fraction of organic nitrogen, but much of this organic matter remains inaccessible due to nitrogen limitation. Microbial nitrification is a key process in the nitrogen cycle, controlling the availability of dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) such as ammonium and nitrate. In this study, we investigate the microbial diversity of canonical nitrifiers and their potential nitrifying activity in the active layer of different Arctic cryosols in the Lena River Delta in North-East Siberia. These cryosols are located on Samoylov Island, which has two geomorphological landscapes with mineral soils in the modern floodplain and organic-rich soils in the low-centered polygonal tundra of the Holocene river terrace. Microcosm incubations show that the highest potential ammonia oxidation rates are found in low organic soils, and the rates depend on organic matter content and quality, vegetation cover, and water content. As shown by 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, nitrifiers represented 0.6% to 6.2% of the total microbial community. More than 50% of the nitrifiers belonged to the genus

Indexed as

ammonia oxidizersArcticcanonical nitrificationcold environmentcryosolsNitrosospirapermafrost-affected landscapes

Identifiers

PMID31847402
PMCPMC6955795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.