Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847327›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2019

Omics Potential in Herbicide-Resistant Weed Management.

Eric L Patterson, Christopher Saski, Anita Küpper, Roland Beffa, Todd A Gaines

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. PeerJ · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Herbicide Resistance in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric L PattersonDepartment of Plant, Soil and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, 1066 Bogue St., East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7111-6287
Christopher SaskiPlant and Environmental Sciences Department, Clemson University, 306B Biosystems Research Complex, Clemson, SC 29634, USA.
Anita KüpperBayer AG, CropScience Division, Weed Control Research, Building H872, 65926 Frankfurt, Germany.
Roland BeffaBayer AG, CropScience Division, Weed Control Research, Building H872, 65926 Frankfurt, Germany.
Todd A GainesDepartment of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management, Colorado State University, 1177 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1485-7665

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid development of omics technologies has drastically altered the way biologists conduct research. Basic plant biology and genomics have incorporated these technologies, while some challenges remain for use in applied biology. Weed science, on the whole, is still learning how to integrate omics technologies into the discipline; however, omics techniques are more frequently being implemented in new and creative ways to address basic questions in weed biology as well as the more practical questions of improving weed management. This has been especially true in the subdiscipline of herbicide resistance where important questions are the evolution and genetic basis of herbicide resistance. This review examines the advantages, challenges, potential solutions, and outlook for omics technologies in the discipline of weed science, with examples of how omics technologies will impact herbicide resistance studies and ultimately improve management of herbicide-resistant populations.

Indexed as

functional genomicsherbicide resistance databaseherbicide resistance diagnosticsintegrated pest managementprecision herbicide resistance managementweed biologyweed evolutionweed genomics

Identifiers

PMID31847327
PMCPMC6963460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.