Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847315›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

A Comparison of Changes in the Fatty Acid Profile of Human Milk of Spanish Lactating Women during the First Month of Lactation Using Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. A Comparison with Infant Formulas.

Silvia Sánchez-Hernández, Adelaida Esteban-Muñoz, Rafael Giménez-Martínez, María José Aguilar-Cordero, Beatriz Miralles-Buraglia, Manuel Olalla-Herrera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvia Sánchez-HernándezDepartment of Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Adelaida Esteban-MuñozDepartment of Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Rafael Giménez-MartínezDepartment of Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
María José Aguilar-CorderoDepartment de Nursing, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Beatriz Miralles-BuragliaInstitute of Food Science Research (CIAL), CSIC-UAM, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Olalla-HerreraDepartment of Nutrition and Bromatology, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain.
Universidad de Granada · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breastfeeding is the ideal way to provide infants with the nutrients they need for healthy growth and development. Milk composition changes throughout lactation, and fat is one of the most variable nutrients in human milk. The aim of this study was to determine the main differences between the fatty acid (FA) profile of human milk samples (colostrum, transitional, and mature milk group) and infant formulas. Human milk samples were provided by lactating women from Granada. Moreover, different commercial infant formulas were analyzed. FAs were determined using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. According to the results, oleic acid was the predominant monounsaturated fatty acid (41.93% in human milk and 43.53% in infant formulas), while palmitic acid was the most representative saturated fatty acid (20.88% in human milk and 23.09% in infant formulas). Significant differences were found between human milk groups and infant formulas, mainly in long-chain polyunsaturated FAs (LC-PUFAs). The content of araquidonic acid (AA) and docoxahexaenoic acid (DHA) was higher in human milk (0.51% and 0.39%, respectively) than in infant formulas (0.31% and 0.22%, respectively). Linoleic acid (LA) percentage (15.31%) in infant formulas was similar to that found in human milk (14.6%). However, α-linolenic acid (ALA) values were also much higher in infant formulas than in human milk (1.64% and 0.42%, respectively).

Indexed as

AdultColostrumFatty AcidsFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansInfant FormulaInfant, NewbornLactationMilk, HumanSpainFatty Acidsfatty acidsGC-MS/MShuman milkinfant formulaLC-PUFA

Identifiers

PMID31847315
PMCPMC6950188
OpenAlexW2994862252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.