ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2019
Magnetic Condition-Independent 3D Joint Angle Estimation Using Inertial Sensors and Kinematic Constraints.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Drift-Free Joint Angle Calculation Using Inertial Measurement Units without Magnetometers: An Exploration of Sensor Fusion Methods for the Elbow and Wrist.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Error Analysis of Accelerometer- and Magnetometer-Based Stationary Alignment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A novel IMU-based clinical assessment protocol for Axial Spondyloarthritis: a protocol validation study.PeerJ · 2021Article
- Machine Learning to Improve Orientation Estimation in Sports Situations Challenging for Inertial Sensor Use.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2021Article
- Body-Worn IMU Human Skeletal Pose Estimation Using a Factor Graph-Based Optimization Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Inertial Sensors-Applications and Challenges in a Nutshell.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In biomechanics, joint angle estimation using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) has been getting great popularity. However, magnetic disturbance issue is considered problematic as the disturbance can seriously degrade the accuracy of the estimated joint angles. This study proposes a magnetic condition-independent three-dimensional (3D) joint angle estimation method based on IMU signals. The proposed method is implemented in a sequential direction cosine matrix-based orientation Kalman filter (KF), which is composed of an attitude estimation KF followed by a heading estimation KF. In the heading estimation KF, an acceleration-level kinematic constraint from a spherical joint replaces the magnetometer signals for the correction procedure. Because the proposed method does not rely on the magnetometer, it is completely magnetic condition-independent and is not affected by the magnetic disturbance. For the averaged root mean squared errors of the three tests performed using a rigid two-link system, the proposed method produced 1.58°, while the conventional method with the magnetic disturbance compensation mechanism produced 5.38°, showing a higher accuracy of the proposed method in the magnetically disturbed conditions. Due to the independence of the proposed method from the magnetic condition, the proposed approach could be reliably applied in various fields that require robust 3D joint angle estimation through IMU signals in an unspecified arbitrary magnetic environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.