Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847203›Full record

ArticleNutrients2019

The Relationship between Self-Reported Exposure to Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Promotions and Intake: Cross-Sectional Analysis of the 2017 International Food Policy Study.

Hannah Forde, Martin White, Louis Levy, Felix Greaves, David Hammond, Lana Vanderlee, Stephen Sharp, Jean Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Food environment research in Canada: a rapid review of methodologies and measures deployed between 2010 and 2021.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The association between exposure to food marketing and dietary intake among youth in six countries.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah FordeCentre for Diet & Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7447-7264
Martin WhiteCentre for Diet & Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1861-6757
Louis LevyPublic Health England, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, Lambeth, London SE1 8UG, UK.
Felix GreavesPublic Health England, Wellington House, 133-155 Waterloo Road, Lambeth, London SE1 8UG, UK.
David HammondSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.
Lana VanderleeSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5384-1821
Stephen SharpCentre for Diet & Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
Jean AdamsCentre for Diet & Activity Research (CEDAR), MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Box 285 Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-7830

Funding

CIHR operating grantDepartment of Health 16/130/01Department of Health PHR/16/130/01Economic and Social Research Council UnknownMedical Research Council MC_UU_12015Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) Applied Public Health Research Chair UnknownPublic Health England UnknownUK Clinical Research Collaboration MR/K023187/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption is independently associated with several non-communicable diseases, so policymakers are increasingly implementing measures, such as marketing regulation, to reduce intake. To help understand how such measures work, this study examined the association between SSB consumption and self-reported exposure to SSB promotions, both overall and by type of promotion, and whether these relationships vary between the UK, USA, Canada, Mexico, and Australia. Cross-sectional analysis of the online 2017 International Food Policy Study was performed (

Indexed as

AdultCross-Sectional StudiesDietFemaleHumansMaleMarketingMiddle AgedNutrition PolicySugar-Sweetened Beveragesadvertisingmarketingpromotionsoft drinkssugarsugar-sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID31847203
PMCPMC6950183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.