Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31847039›Full record

ReviewSeminars in neurology2019

Update on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.

Sarah R Ahmad, Heather E Moss

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Venous sinus stenosis intracranial hypertension, rethinking idiopathic intracranial hypertension in the setting of venous sinus stenosis: A call for new nomenclature and diagnostic precision.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  7. The diagnostic value of MRI findings in pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a case-control study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neuro-Ophthalmic Emergencies.Neurologic clinics · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah R AhmadDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Heather E MossDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.ORCID 0000-0003-4373-447X

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Yang Hu · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
Physiologically Based Markers of Idiopathic Intracranial HypertensionK23EY024345 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MOSS, HEATHER ELSPETH · 2014 to 2018
$1.1M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY024345NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in ophthalmic diagnostics and results of interventional clinical trials are shifting diagnosis and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) to be more technology- and evidence-based. In this article, the evidence supporting current diagnostic criteria, evaluation, and medical and surgical management of IIH are reviewed.

Indexed as

HumansPseudotumor Cerebri

Identifiers

PMID31847039
PMCPMC7713505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.