ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020
Coverage of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception has improved birth intervals for at-risk populations.
Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of interventions applied to pregnant and postpartum women on postpartum comfort: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Determinants of short interpregnancy intervals in high-income countries: a systematic review.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2025Pooled it
- Health Insurance Coverage and Postpartum Outcomes in the US: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Integrating a Postpartum Contraception Intervention in the Maternal and Child Health Care System of China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- Medicaid reimbursement policies for long-acting reversible contraceptives immediately postpartum: A systematic literature review.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Review
- Barriers and facilitators to contraception provision among rural healthcare providers.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Does reversible postpartum contraception reduce the risk of pregnancy condition recurrence? A longitudinal claims-based study from Maine.Annals of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Medicaid Policy Change and Immediate Postpartum Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.JAMA health forum · 2024Article
- Postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive adoption after a statewide initiative.Health services research · 2024Article
- Examining the impact of Medicaid payments for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception on the mental health of low-income mothers.Health services research · 2024Article
- Determinants of postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptives in the extended postpartum period in Shashago district, Central Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study conducted in the community.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2024Article
- Comparing approaches to identify live births using the Transformed Medicaid Statistical Information System.Health services research · 2024Article
- Results of Immediate Postpartum Long Acting Reversible Contraception Provision After Expanded Reimbursement Policy Implementation at an Academic Medical Institution.Maternal and child health journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Breastfeeding Perceptions and Behavior Among Postpartum Women Initiating Different Hormonally Systemic Contraceptive Methods.Journal of human lactation : official journal of International Lactation Consultant Association · 2023Article
- Uptake of postplacental intrauterine device placement at cesarean delivery.AJOG global reports · 2023Article
- Association of Opioid Use Disorder and Provision of Highly Effective Inpatient Postpartum Contraception.Open access journal of contraception · 2023Article
- The effect of contraceptive access reform on privately insured patients: Evidence from Delaware Contraceptive Access Now.PloS one · 2023Article
- Immediate Postpartum Insertion of Copper Intrauterine Device in a Brazilian University Hospital: Expulsion and Continuation Rates.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn 2012, South Carolina revised the Medicaid policy to cover reimbursement for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception may improve health outcomes for populations at risk with a subsequent short-interval pregnancy.
objectivesWe examined the impact of the Medicaid policy change on the initiation of long-acting and reversible contraception (immediate postpartum and postpartum) within key populations. We determined whether immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception use varied by adequate prenatal care (>7 visits), metropolitan location, and medical comorbidities. We also tested the association of immediate postpartum and postpartum long-acting, reversible contraception on interpregnancy interval of less than 18 months. STUDY
designWe conducted a historical cohort study of live births among Medicaid recipients in South Carolina between 2010 and 2017, 2 years before and 5 years after the policy change. We used birth certificate data linked with Medicaid claims. Our primary outcome was immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception, and our secondary outcome was short interpregnancy interval. We characterize trends in long-acting and reversible contraception use and interpregnancy interval over the study period. We used logistic regression models to test the association of key factors (rural, inadequate prenatal care, and medical comorbidities) with immediate and outpatient postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception following the policy change and to test the association of immediate postpartum and postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception with short interpregnancy interval.
resultsOur sample included 187,438 births to 145,973 women. Overall, 44.7% of the sample was white, with a mean age of 25.0 years. A majority of the sample (61.5%) was multiparous and resided in metropolitan areas (79.5%). The odds of receipt of immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception use increased after the policy change (adjusted odds ratio, 1.39, 95% confidence interval, 1.34-1.43). Women with inadequate prenatal care (adjusted odds ratio, 1.50, 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.71) and medically complex pregnancies had higher odds of receipt of immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception following the policy change (adjusted odds ratio, 1.47, 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.67) compared with women with adequate prenatal care and normal pregnancies. Women residing in rural areas were less likely to receive immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception (adjusted odds ratio, 0.36, 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.44) than women in metropolitan areas. Utilization of immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception was associated with a decreased odds of a subsequent short interpregnancy interval (adjusted odds ratio, 0.62, 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.89).
conclusionWomen at risk of a subsequent pregnancy and complications (inadequate prenatal care and medical comorbidities) are more likely to receive immediate postpartum long-acting and reversible contraception following the policy change. Efforts are needed to improve access in rural areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.