Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31846501›Full record

ArticlePhysical therapy2020

Implementation of a Cost-Effective Physical Therapy Approach (Coach2Move) to Improve Physical Activity in Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mobility Problems: Protocol for a Cluster-Randomized, Stepped Wedge Trial.

Ward Heij, Steven Teerenstra, Lieke Sweerts, J Bart Staal, Maria W G Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Thomas J Hoogeboom

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Physical therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Incorporating Physical Activity Assessments and Behavior Change Techniques Into Geriatrics.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ward HeijRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Steven TeerenstraRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Health Evidence, Section Biostatistics.
Lieke SweertsRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare; Radboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics.
J Bart StaalRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare; and HAN University of Applied Sciences, Research Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Maria W G Nijhuis-van der SandenRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare.
Thomas J HoogeboomRadboud university medical center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoach2Move is a personalized treatment strategy by physical therapists to elicit physical activity in community-dwelling older adults with mobility problems.

objectiveThe primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the implementation of Coach2Move compared with regular care physical therapy in daily clinical practice. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND

interventionA multicenter cluster-randomized stepped wedge trial is being implemented in 16 physical therapist practices (4 clusters of 4 practices in 4 steps) in the Netherlands. The study aims to include 400 older adults (≥70 years) living independently with mobility problems and/or physically inactive lifestyles. The intervention group receives physical therapy conforming to the Coach2Move strategy; the usual care group receives typical physical therapist care. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements are taken at baseline and 3, 6, and 12 months after the start of treatment. The primary outcomes for effectiveness are the amount of physical activity (LASA Physical Activity Questionnaire) and functional mobility (Timed Up and Go test). Trial success can be declared if at least 1 parameter improves while another does not deteriorate. Secondary outcomes are level of frailty (Evaluative Frailty Index for Physical Activity), perceived effect (Global Perceived Effect and Patient Specific Complaints questionnaire), quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L), and health care expenditures. Multilevel linear regression analyses are used to compare the outcomes between treatment groups according to an intention-to-treat approach. Alongside the trial, a mixed-methods process evaluation is performed to understand the outcomes, evaluate therapist fidelity to the strategy, and detect barriers and facilitators in implementation. LIMITATIONS: An important limitation of the study design is the inability to blind treating therapists to study allocation. DISCUSSION: The trial provides insight into the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Coach2Move strategy compared with usual care. The process evaluation provides insight into influencing factors related to outcomes and implementation.

Indexed as

ExerciseIndependent LivingMobility LimitationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPrecision MedicineTime FactorsAgedExerciseHealth Plan ImplementationPhysical TherapistsPrimary Health CareQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID31846501
PMCPMC7297439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.