Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31846490›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Feasibility of thin-slice abdominal CT in overweight patients using a vendor neutral image-based denoising algorithm: Assessment of image noise, contrast, and quality.

Akio Tamura, Manabu Nakayama, Yoshitaka Ota, Masayoshi Kamata, Yasuyuki Hirota, Misato Sone, Makoto Hamano, Ryoichi Tanaka, Kunihiro Yoshioka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akio TamuraDepartment of Radiology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9605-721X
Manabu NakayamaDepartment of Radiology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.
Yoshitaka OtaDivision of Central Radiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Morioka, Japan.
Masayoshi KamataDivision of Central Radiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Morioka, Japan.
Yasuyuki HirotaDivision of Central Radiology, Iwate Medical University Hospital, Morioka, Japan.
Misato SoneDepartment of Radiology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.
Makoto HamanoDepartment of Radiology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.
Ryoichi TanakaDivision of Dental Radiology, Department of General Dentistry, Iwate Medical University School of Dentistry, Morioka, Japan.
Kunihiro YoshiokaDepartment of Radiology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Japan.
Iwate Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the novel image-based noise reduction software (NRS) improves image quality, and to assess the feasibility of using this software in combination with hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR) in image quality on thin-slice abdominal CT. In this retrospective study, 54 patients who underwent dynamic liver CT between April and July 2017 and had a body mass index higher than 25 kg/m2 were included. Three image sets of each patient were reconstructed as follows: hybrid IR images with 1-mm slice thickness (group A), hybrid IR images with 5-mm slice thickness (group B), and hybrid IR images with 1-mm slice thickness denoised using NRS (group C). The mean image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio relative to the muscle of the aorta and liver were assessed. Subjective image quality was evaluated by two radiologists for sharpness, noise, contrast, and overall quality using 5-point scales. The mean image noise was significantly lower in group C than in group A (p < 0.01), but no significant difference was observed between groups B and C. The contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher in group C than in group A (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). Subjective image quality was also significantly higher in group C than in group A (p < 0.01), in terms of noise and overall quality, but not in terms of sharpness and contrast (p = 0.65 and 0.07, respectively). The contrast of images in group C was greater than that in group A, but this difference was not significant. Compared with hybrid IR alone, the novel NRS combined with a hybrid IR could result in significant noise reduction without sacrificing image quality on CT. This combined approach will likely be particularly useful for thin-slice abdominal CT examinations of overweight patients.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdomenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedOverweightQuality ControlRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31846490
PMCPMC6917298
OpenAlexW2994704039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.