ArticlePLoS medicine2019
Social determinants of health in relation to firearm-related homicides in the United States: A nationwide multilevel cross-sectional study.
Article in PLoS medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.
- Analysis of Firearm Violence During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Enhancing Gun Violence Surveillance with Endemic-Epidemic Modeling: A Case Study in Washington, D.C.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2026Article
- How local prevention efforts and state regulations intersect to reduce fatal shootings: a configurational analysis of firearm policies in the United States.Journal of public health policy · 2026Article
- Race/ethnicity on firearm & self-injuries during COVID-19 using TQIP data.Surgery open science · 2026Article
- Community violence intervention: measuring risk & protective factors for gun use among program participants.Health & justice · 2026Review
- Exploring the correlation between suicide and homicide rates with percentage of gentrification and by sex.Frontiers in sociology · 2026Article
- Public funds, public safety: a scoping review of government spending decisions and their impact on interpersonal violence and suicide.Injury epidemiology · 2025Review
- A Computational Approach to Analyzing Spatiotemporal Trends in Gun Violence and Mental Health Disparities among Racialized Communities in US Metropolitan Areas.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025Article
- Redlining, reinvestment, and racial segregation: a bayesian spatial analysis of mortgage lending trajectories and firearm-related violence.Injury epidemiology · 2025Article
- Understanding disparities in firearm mortality: The role of person- and place-based factors.Injury · 2025Article
- The Recent Rise in Homicide: An Analysis of Weekly Mortality Data, United States, 2018-2022.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Homicide Rates Across County, Race, Ethnicity, Age, and Sex in the US: A Global Burden of Disease Study.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- National analysis of health-related social needs among adult injury survivors.The journal of trauma and acute care surgery · 2025Article
- Introduction to Ballistic Injuries.Seminars in plastic surgery · 2025Review
- How do mass shootings shape the social media discourse on guns in the US Congress? Causal discovery and topic modeling.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Content assessment and readability of online injury prevention resources on firearm safety: a cross-sectional analysis of hospital and national injury prevention literature.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- Firearm violence and associated factors among young adults presenting to emergency departments in three cities: Baseline results from Project SPARK.Preventive medicine · 2024Article
- Measuring the effect of historical structural racism on community firearm violence in US cities.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2024Article
- Using EMS data to explore community-level factors associated with firearm violence in North Carolina.Injury epidemiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGun violence has shortened the average life expectancy of Americans, and better knowledge about the root causes of gun violence is crucial to its prevention. While some empirical evidence exists regarding the impacts of social and economic factors on violence and firearm homicide rates, to the author's knowledge, there has yet to be a comprehensive and comparative lagged, multilevel investigation of major social determinants of health in relation to firearm homicides and mass shootings. METHODS AND
findingsThis study used negative binomial regression models and geolocated gun homicide incident data from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2015, to explore and compare the independent associations of key state-, county-, and neighborhood-level social determinants of health-social mobility, social capital, income inequality, racial and economic segregation, and social spending-with neighborhood firearm-related homicides and mass shootings in the United States, accounting for relevant state firearm laws and a variety of state, county, and neighborhood (census tract [CT]) characteristics. Latitude and longitude coordinates on firearm-related deaths were previously collected by the Gun Violence Archive, and then linked by the British newspaper The Guardian to CTs according to 2010 Census geographies. The study population consisted of all 74,134 CTs as defined for the 2010 Census in the 48 states of the contiguous US. The final sample spanned 70,579 CTs, containing an estimated 314,247,908 individuals, or 98% of the total US population in 2015. The analyses were based on 13,060 firearm-related deaths in 2015, with 11,244 non-mass shootings taking place in 8,673 CTs and 141 mass shootings occurring in 138 CTs. For area-level social determinants, lag periods of 3 to 17 years were examined based on existing theory, empirical evidence, and data availability. County-level institutional social capital (levels of trust in institutions), social mobility, income inequality, and public welfare spending exhibited robust relationships with CT-level gun homicide rates and the total numbers of combined non-mass and mass shooting homicide incidents and non-mass shooting homicide incidents alone. A 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in institutional social capital was linked to a 19% reduction in the homicide rate (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.91, p < 0.001) and a 17% decrease in the number of firearm homicide incidents (IRR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.95, p = 0.01). Upward social mobility was related to a 25% reduction in the gun homicide rate (IRR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.86, p < 0.001) and a 24% decrease in the number of homicide incidents (IRR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.67-0.87, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, 1-SD increases in the neighborhood percentages of residents in poverty and males living alone were associated with 26%-27% and 12% higher homicide rates, respectively. Study limitations include possible residual confounding by factors at the individual/household level, and lack of disaggregation of gun homicide data by gender and race/ethnicity.
conclusionsThis study finds that the rich-poor gap, level of citizens' trust in institutions, economic opportunity, and public welfare spending are all related to firearm homicide rates in the US. Further establishing the causal nature of these associations and modifying these social determinants may help to address the growing gun violence epidemic and reverse recent life expectancy declines among Americans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.