Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31846471›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Menagerie: A text-mining tool to support animal-human translation in neurodegeneration research.

Caroline J Zeiss, Dongwook Shin, Brent Vander Wyk, Amanda P Beck, Natalie Zatz, Charles A Sneiderman, Halil Kilicoglu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neuroprotection and Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation: Facts or Fiction?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Levelling the Translational Gap for Animal to Human Efficacy Data.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caroline J ZeissDepartment of Comparative Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1181-3544
Dongwook ShinLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Brent Vander WykDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Amanda P BeckDepartment of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, United States of America.
Natalie ZatzDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Charles A SneidermanLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Halil KilicogluLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3987-9393

Funding

Yale Study Support Suite (YES3): Dashboard and Web Portal Software Supporting Research Workflow through integrated, customizable REDCap External ModulesP30AG021342 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Albert C Shaw · 2002 to 2026
$37.9M
Research Training in Disability &Disabling DisordersK24AG021507 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GILL, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2003 to 2012
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS K24 AG021507NIA NIH HHS P30 AG021342
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery studies in animals constitute a cornerstone of biomedical research, but suffer from lack of generalizability to human populations. We propose that large-scale interrogation of these data could reveal patterns of animal use that could narrow the translational divide. We describe a text-mining approach that extracts translationally useful data from PubMed abstracts. These comprise six modules: species, model, genes, interventions/disease modifiers, overall outcome and functional outcome measures. Existing National Library of Medicine natural language processing tools (SemRep, GNormPlus and the Chemical annotator) underpin the program and are further augmented by various rules, term lists, and machine learning models. Evaluation of the program using a 98-abstract test set achieved F1 scores ranging from 0.75-0.95 across all modules, and exceeded F1 scores obtained from comparable baseline programs. Next, the program was applied to a larger 14,481 abstract data set (2008-2017). Expected and previously identified patterns of species and model use for the field were obtained. As previously noted, the majority of studies reported promising outcomes. Longitudinal patterns of intervention type or gene mentions were demonstrated, and patterns of animal model use characteristic of the Parkinson's disease field were confirmed. The primary function of the program is to overcome low external validity of animal model systems by aggregating evidence across a diversity of models that capture different aspects of a multifaceted cellular process. Some aspects of the tool are generalizable, whereas others are field-specific. In the initial version presented here, we demonstrate proof of concept within a single disease area, Parkinson's disease. However, the program can be expanded in modular fashion to support a wider range of neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchData MiningNeurodegenerative DiseasesAnimalsHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CareTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID31846471
PMCPMC6917268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.