Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31846452›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Revisiting the "satisfaction of spatial restraints" approach of MODELLER for protein homology modeling.

Giacomo Janson, Alessandro Grottesi, Marco Pietrosanto, Gabriele Ausiello, Giulia Guarguaglini, Alessandro Paiardini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Illuminating the "Twilight Zone": Advances in Difficult Protein Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predicting epitopes for vaccine development using bioinformatics tools.Therapeutic advances in vaccines and immunotherapy · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giacomo JansonDepartment of Biochemical Sciences "A. Rossi Fanelli", "Sapienza" University of Rome, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1757-4193
Alessandro GrottesiSuper Computing Applications and Innovation (CINECA), Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2168-5075
Marco PietrosantoCentre for Molecular Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5129-6065
Gabriele AusielloCentre for Molecular Bioinformatics, Department of Biology, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy.
Giulia GuarguagliniDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology, Institute of Molecular Biology and Pathology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Roma, Italy.
Alessandro PaiardiniDepartment of Biochemical Sciences "A. Rossi Fanelli", "Sapienza" University of Rome, Roma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most frequently used approach for protein structure prediction is currently homology modeling. The 3D model building phase of this methodology is critical for obtaining an accurate and biologically useful prediction. The most widely employed tool to perform this task is MODELLER. This program implements the "modeling by satisfaction of spatial restraints" strategy and its core algorithm has not been altered significantly since the early 1990s. In this work, we have explored the idea of modifying MODELLER with two effective, yet computationally light strategies to improve its 3D modeling performance. Firstly, we have investigated how the level of accuracy in the estimation of structural variability between a target protein and its templates in the form of σ values profoundly influences 3D modeling. We show that the σ values produced by MODELLER are on average weakly correlated to the true level of structural divergence between target-template pairs and that increasing this correlation greatly improves the program's predictions, especially in multiple-template modeling. Secondly, we have inquired into how the incorporation of statistical potential terms (such as the DOPE potential) in the MODELLER's objective function impacts positively 3D modeling quality by providing a small but consistent improvement in metrics such as GDT-HA and lDDT and a large increase in stereochemical quality. Python modules to harness this second strategy are freely available at https://github.com/pymodproject/altmod. In summary, we show that there is a large room for improving MODELLER in terms of 3D modeling quality and we propose strategies that could be pursued in order to further increase its performance.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularSoftwareStructural Homology, ProteinAlgorithmsComputational BiologyMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsSequence AlignmentProteins

Identifiers

PMID31846452
PMCPMC6938380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.