Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31846450›Full record

ArticleLa Medicina del lavoro2019

Position Paper on Asbestos of the Italian Society of Occupational Medicine.

Pietro Apostoli, Paolo Boffetta, Massimo Bovenzi, Pier Luigi Cocco, Dario Consonni, Alfonso Cristaudo, Gianluigi Discalzi, Andrea Farioli, Maurizio Manno, Stefano Mattioli and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in La Medicina del lavoro, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pulmonary Function and CT Scan Imaging at Low-Level Occupational Exposureto Asbestos.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Pietro ApostoliDipartimento di Specialità Medico-Chirurgiche, Scienze Radiologiche e Sanità Pubblica, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Brescia, Italia.. redazione@lamedicinadellavoro.com.
Paolo Boffetta
Massimo Bovenzi
Pier Luigi Cocco
Dario Consonni
Alfonso Cristaudo
Gianluigi Discalzi
Andrea Farioli
Maurizio Manno
Stefano Mattioli
Enrico Pira
Leonardo Soleo
Giuseppe Taino
Francesco Saverio Violante
Carlo Zocchetti
University of Bologna · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · ITIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Trieste · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Position Paper (PP) on asbestos of the Italian Society of Occupational Medicine (SIML) aims at providing a tool to the occupational physician to address current diagnostic criteria and results of epidemiological studies, and their consequences in terms of preventive and evaluation actions for insurance, compensation and litigation. The PP was based on an extensive review of the scientific literature and was compiled by a Working Group comprising researchers who have contributed to the international literature on asbestos-related diseases, as well as occupational physicians with extensive experience in the evaluation of risks and the medical surveillance of workers currently and formerly exposed to asbestos. The PP was drafted and reviewed between 2017 and 2018; its final version was prepared according to the guidelines of AGREE Reporting Checklist. All the members of the Working Group subscribed to the document, which was eventually approved by SIML's Executive Committee. The first section addresses industrial hygiene issues, such as methods for environmental monitoring, advantages and limitations of different microscopy techniques, the potential role of microfibers and approaches for retrospective assessment of exposure, in particular in epidemiological studies. The second section reviews the biological effects of asbestos with particular attention to the diagnostic aspects of asbestosis, pleural changes, mesothelioma and lung cancer. In the following section the criteria of causal attribution are discussed, together with different hypotheses on the form of the risk functions, with a comparison of the opinions prevalent in the literature. In particular, the models of the risk function for mesothelioma were examined, in the light of the hypothesis of an acceleration or anticipation of the events in relation to the dose. The last section discusses topics of immediate relevance for the occupational physician, such as health surveillance of former exposed and of workers currently exposed in remediation activities.

Indexed as

AsbestosAsbestosisLung NeoplasmsMesotheliomaOccupational ExposureOccupational MedicinePleural NeoplasmsHumansItalyRetrospective StudiesAsbestos

Identifiers

PMID31846450
PMCPMC7809933
OpenAlexW2996152816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.