Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31846206›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2020

Delivery mode for prolonged, obstructed labour resulting in obstetric fistula: a retrospective review of 4396 women in East and Central Africa.

C J Ngongo, Tjip Raassen, L Lombard, J van Roosmalen, S Weyers, M Temmerman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Spatial disparities and determinants of obstetric fistula among childbearing women in sub-Saharan Africa: A geospatial regression approach.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

C J NgongoRTI International, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6501-5532
Tjip RaassenNairobi, Kenya.
L LombardCape Town, South Africa.
J van RoosmalenAthena Institute VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
S WeyersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2828-8037
M TemmermanCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Nairobi, Kenya.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9966-9000
Ghent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BELeiden University Medical Center · NLRTI International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the mode of delivery and stillbirth rates over time among women with obstetric fistula.

designRetrospective record review.

settingTanzania, Uganda, Kenya, Malawi, Rwanda, Somalia, South Sudan, Zambia and Ethiopia. POPULATION: A total of 4396 women presenting with obstetric fistulas for repair who delivered previously in facilities between 1990 and 2014.

methodsRetrospective review of trends and associations between mode of delivery and stillbirth, focusing on caesarean section (CS), assisted vaginal deliveries and spontaneous vaginal deliveries.

main outcome measuresMode of delivery, stillbirth.

resultsOut of 4396 women with fistula, 3695 (84.1%) delivered a stillborn baby. Among mothers with fistula giving birth to a stillborn baby, the CS rate (overall 54.8%, 2027/3695) rose from 45% (162/361) in 1990-94 to 64% (331/514) in 2010-14. This increase occurred at the expense of assisted vaginal delivery (overall 18.3%, 676/3695), which declined from 32% (115/361) to 6% (31/514).

conclusionsIn Eastern and Central Africa, CS is increasingly performed on women with obstructed labour whose babies have already died in utero. Contrary to international recommendations, alternatives such as vacuum extraction, forceps and destructive delivery are decreasingly used. Unless uterine rupture is suspected, CS should be avoided in obstructed labour with intrauterine fetal death to avoid complications related to CS scars in subsequent pregnancies. Increasingly, women with obstetric fistula add a history of unnecessary CS to their already grim experiences of prolonged, obstructed labour and stillbirth. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Caesarean section is increasingly performed in African women with stillbirth treated for obstetric fistula.

Indexed as

AdultAfrica, CentralAfrica, EasternCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleFetal DeathHumansObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRectovaginal FistulaRetrospective StudiesStillbirthVacuum Extraction, ObstetricalVesicovaginal FistulaAssisted vaginal deliverycaesarean sectiondestructive deliveryobstetric fistulastillbirthvacuum extraction

Identifiers

PMID31846206
PMCPMC7187175
OpenAlexW2996467772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.