SynthesisJAMA2019
Does This Patient Have Hip Osteoarthritis?: The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review.
Synthesis in JAMA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antithrombotic prophylaxis following total hip arthroplasty: a level I Bayesian network meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024Pooled it
- Machine Learning-Based Identification of Molecular Signatures in PTOA Cell Subtypes via Single-Cell Transcriptomics in a Mouse Model.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Combined ultrasound-guided hyaluronic acid injections, high-power laser therapy and physiotherapy improve hip function in osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-enabled molecular imaging diagnosis of osteoarthritis.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Sensitivity and Specificity for Physical Examination Tests in Diagnosing Prearthritic Intra-Articular Hip Pathology Are Highly Variable: A Systematic Review.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Musculoskeletal mimics of lumbosacral radiculopathy.Muscle & nerve · 2025Review
- Osteoarthritis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2025Review
- Targeting ERRs to counteract age-related muscle atrophy associated with physical inactivity: a pilot study.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
- Demographic characteristics influencing the stem subsidence in total hip arthroplasty: an imaging study.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- A marker-less human motion analysis system for motion-based biomarker identification and quantification in knee disorders.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Article
- Osteoarthritis of the hip: is radiography still needed?Skeletal radiology · 2023Review
- Epidemiology of Hip Osteoarthritis: The Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2023Review
- Clinical reasoning in managing chronic hip pain: One in two Australian and New Zealand physiotherapists diagnosed a case vignette with clinical criteria for hip OA as hip OA. A cross-sectional survey.Musculoskeletal care · 2023Article
- An EDucation and eXercise intervention for gluteal tendinopathy in an Irish setting: a protocol for a feasibility randomised clinical trial (LEAP-Ireland RCT).HRB open research · 2023Article
- Is simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty deleterious in a biomechanical point of view? A comparative gait analysis study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- A Case of Fragility Fracture of the Pelvis Initially Diagnosed as Osteoarthritis of the Hip.Arthroplasty today · 2022Article
- Physical therapy as a promising treatment for osteoarthritis: A narrative review.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- The natural history of greater trochanteric pain syndrome: an 11-year follow-up study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2021Article
- Article
- Diagnostic criteria for early hip osteoarthritis: first steps, based on the CHECK study.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
importanceHip osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of pain and disability.
objectiveTo identify the clinical findings that are most strongly associated with hip OA. DATA SOURCES: Systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL from inception until November 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies (1) quantified the accuracy of clinical findings (history, physical examination, or simple tests) and (2) used plain radiographs as the reference standard for diagnosing hip OA. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Studies were assigned levels of evidence using the Rational Clinical Examination scale and assessed for risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool. Data were extracted using individual hips as the unit of analysis and only pooled when findings were reported in 3 or more studies. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs).
resultsSix studies were included, with data from 1110 patients and 1324 hips, of which 509 (38%) showed radiographic evidence of OA. Among patients presenting to primary care physicians with hip or groin pain, the affected hip showed radiographic evidence of OA in 34% of cases. A family history of OA, personal history of knee OA, or pain on climbing stairs or walking up slopes all had LRs of 2.1 (sensitivity range, 33%-68%; specificity range, 68%-84%; broadest LR range: 95% CI, 1.1-3.8). To identify patients most likely to have OA, the most useful findings were squat causing posterior pain (sensitivity, 24%; specificity, 96%; LR, 6.1 [95% CI, 1.3-29]), groin pain on passive abduction or adduction (sensitivity, 33%; specificity, 94%; LR, 5.7 [95% CI, 1.6-20]), abductor weakness (sensitivity, 44%; specificity, 90%; LR, 4.5 [95% CI, 2.4-8.4]), and decreased passive hip adduction (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 81%; LR, 4.2 [95% CI, 3.0-6.0]) or internal rotation (sensitivity, 66%; specificity, 79%; LR, 3.2 [95% CI, 1.7-6.0]) as measured by a goniometer or compared with the contralateral leg. The presence of normal passive hip adduction was most useful for suggesting the absence of OA (negative LR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.11-0.54]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Simple tests of hip motion and observing for pain during that motion were helpful in distinguishing patients most likely to have OA on plain radiography from those who will not. A combination of findings efficiently detects those most likely to have severe hip OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.