ArticleJournal of vision2019
A novel Bayesian adaptive method for mapping the visual field.
Article in Journal of vision, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mesopic and glare driving performance in a driving simulator.Traffic injury prevention · 2025Article
- Assessment of visual function under various lighting conditions in a cohort of active older drivers: dimensionality and principal metrics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- TORONTO: A trial-oriented multidimensional psychometric testing algorithm.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Visual Function and Driving Performance Under Different Lighting Conditions in Older Drivers: Preliminary Results From an Observational Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- The Random Step Method for Measuring the Point of Subjective Equality.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Consistency of preferred retinal locus across tasks and participants trained with a simulated scotoma.Vision research · 2023Article
- Assessing the contrast sensitivity function in myopic parafovea: A quick contrast sensitivity functions study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Evaluating the Performance of qVFM in Mapping the Visual Field of Simulated Observers With Eye Diseases.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Do Impairments in Visual Functions Affect Skiing Performance?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Psychophysical Validation of a Novel Active Learning Approach for Measuring the Visual Acuity Behavioral Function.Translational vision science & technology · 2021Article
- Mapping the Contrast Sensitivity of the Visual Field With Bayesian Adaptive qVFM.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measuring visual functions such as light and contrast sensitivity, visual acuity, reading speed, and crowding across retinal locations provides visual-field maps (VFMs) that are extremely valuable for detecting and managing eye diseases. Although mapping light sensitivity is a standard glaucoma test, the measurement is often noisy (Keltner et al., 2000). Mapping other visual functions is even more challenging. To improve the precision of light-sensitivity mapping and enable other VFM assessments, we developed a novel hybrid Bayesian adaptive testing framework, the qVFM method. The method combines a global module for preliminary assessment of the VFM's shape and a local module for assessing individual visual-field locations. This study validates the qVFM method in measuring light sensitivity across the visual field. In both simulation and psychophysics studies, we sampled 100 visual-field locations (60° × 60°) and compared the performance of qVFM with the qYN procedure (Lesmes et al., 2015) that measured light sensitivity at each location independently. In the simulations, a simulated observer was tested monocularly for 1,000 runs with 1,200 trials/run, to compare the accuracy and precision of the two methods. In the experiments, data were collected from 12 eyes (six left, six right) of six human subjects. Subjects were cued to report the presence or absence of a target stimulus, with the luminance and location of the target adaptively selected in each trial. Both simulations and a psychological experiment showed that the qVFM method can provide accurate, precise, and efficient mapping of light sensitivity. This method can be extended to map other visual functions, with potential clinical signals for monitoring vision loss, evaluating therapeutic interventions, and developing effective rehabilitation for low vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.