Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845845›Full record

ArticleRadiology2020

Deep Learning for Predicting Enhancing Lesions in Multiple Sclerosis from Noncontrast MRI.

Ponnada A Narayana, Ivan Coronado, Sheeba J Sujit, Jerry S Wolinsky, Fred D Lublin, Refaat E Gabr

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Deep Learning Framework for Automated MRI Planimetry in Multiple Sclerosis.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Predicting multiple sclerosis severity with multimodal deep neural networks.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ponnada A NarayanaFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (P.A.N., I.C., S.J.S., R.E.G.) and Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574 (F.D.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-5703-4346
Ivan CoronadoFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (P.A.N., I.C., S.J.S., R.E.G.) and Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574 (F.D.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-9303-962X
Sheeba J SujitFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (P.A.N., I.C., S.J.S., R.E.G.) and Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574 (F.D.L.).
Jerry S WolinskyFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (P.A.N., I.C., S.J.S., R.E.G.) and Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574 (F.D.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-8197-2762
Fred D LublinFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (P.A.N., I.C., S.J.S., R.E.G.) and Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574 (F.D.L.).
Refaat E GabrFrom the Departments of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (P.A.N., I.C., S.J.S., R.E.G.) and Neurology (J.S.W.), McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030; and Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029-6574 (F.D.L.).ORCID 0000-0002-8802-3201
The University of Texas Health Science Center · US

Funding

Predicting contrast enhancement in multiple sclerosis with real time texture analysisR56NS105857 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI NARAYANA, PONNADA A · 2018 to 2018
$536k
NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS105857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Enhancing lesions on MRI scans obtained after contrast material administration are commonly thought to represent disease activity in multiple sclerosis (MS); it is desirable to develop methods that can predict enhancing lesions without the use of contrast material. Purpose To evaluate whether deep learning can predict enhancing lesions on MRI scans obtained without the use of contrast material. Materials and Methods This study involved prospective analysis of existing MRI data. A convolutional neural network was used for classification of enhancing lesions on unenhanced MRI scans. This classification was performed for each slice, and the slice scores were combined by using a fully connected network to produce participant-wise predictions. The network input consisted of 1970 multiparametric MRI scans from 1008 patients recruited from 2005 to 2009. Enhanced lesions on postcontrast T1-weighted images served as the ground truth. The network performance was assessed by using fivefold cross-validation. Statistical analysis of the network performance included calculation of lesion detection rates and areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs). Results MRI scans from 1008 participants (mean age, 37.7 years ± 9.7; 730 women) were analyzed. At least one enhancing lesion was observed in 519 participants. The sensitivity and specificity averaged across the five test sets were 78% ± 4.3 and 73% ± 2.7, respectively, for slice-wise prediction. The corresponding participant-wise values were 72% ± 9.0 and 70% ± 6.3. The diagnostic performances (AUCs) were 0.82 ± 0.02 and 0.75 ± 0.03 for slice-wise and participant-wise enhancement prediction, respectively. Conclusion Deep learning used with conventional MRI identified enhanced lesions in multiple sclerosis from images from unenhanced multiparametric MRI with moderate to high accuracy. © RSNA, 2019.

Indexed as

AdultBrainDeep LearningFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultiple SclerosisPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31845845
PMCPMC6980901
OpenAlexW2994834352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.