Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845590›Full record

SynthesisCartilage2021

Cartilage Restoration of Patellofemoral Lesions: A Systematic Review.

Renato Andrade, Joni Nunes, Betina B Hinckel, Jordan Gruskay, Sebastiano Vasta, Ricardo Bastos, J Miguel Oliveira, Rui L Reis, Andreas H Gomoll, João Espregueira-Mendes

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cartilage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Magnetic resonance imaging is able to detect patellofemoral focal cartilage injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. [Patellar cartilage repair-current concepts and evidence].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  7. AMIC achieves sustained clinical improvement in isolated patellar cartilage defects over 5 years, correlating with MRI.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Renato AndradeClínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Porto, Portugal.
Joni NunesHospital de Braga, Braga, Portugal.
Betina B HinckelBrigham and Woman's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jordan GruskayHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Sebastiano VastaOrthopaedics and Trauma Surgery Department, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Ricardo BastosClínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Porto, Portugal.
J Miguel Oliveira3B's Research Group, I3Bs-Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Barco, Guimarães, Portugal.
Rui L Reis3B's Research Group, I3Bs-Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables and Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of the European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Barco, Guimarães, Portugal.
Andreas H GomollHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
João Espregueira-MendesClínica do Dragão, Espregueira-Mendes Sports Centre - FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7429-4900
Hospital for Special Surgery · USUniversity of Minho · PTEspregueira Mendes Clinic · PTHarvard University · USHospital Braga · PTUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to systematically analyze the postoperative clinical, functional, and imaging outcomes, complications, reoperations, and failures following patellofemoral cartilage restoration surgery.

methodsThis review was conducted according to the guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to August 31, 2018, to identify clinical studies that assessed surgical outcomes of patellofemoral cartilage restoration surgery. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used to assess study quality.

resultsForty-two studies were included comprising 1,311 knees (mean age of 33.7 years and 56% males) and 1,309 patellofemoral defects (891 patella, 254 trochlear, 95 bipolar, and 69 multiple defects, including the patella or trochlea) at a mean follow-up of 59.2 months. Restoration techniques included autologous chondrocyte implantation (56%), particulated juvenile allograft cartilage (12%), autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (9%), osteochondral autologous transplantation (9%), and osteochondral allograft transplantation (7%). Significant improvement in at least one score was present in almost all studies and these surpassed the minimal clinically important difference threshold. There was a weighted 19%, 35%, and 6% rate of reported complications, reoperations, and failures, respectively. Concomitant patellofemoral surgery (51% of patients) mostly did not lead to statistically different postoperative outcomes.

conclusionNumerous patellofemoral restoration techniques result in significant functional improvement with a low rate of failure. No definitive conclusions could be made to determine the best surgical technique since comparative studies on this topic are rare, and treatment choice should be made according to specific patient and defect characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level II to IV studies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCartilage, ArticularCartilage DiseasesChondrocytesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatellaTransplantation, Autologouscartilagechondralosteochondralpatellofemoralrestoration

Identifiers

PMID31845590
PMCPMC8808938
OpenAlexW2995939137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.