Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845547›Full record

ArticleDiabetes/metabolism research and reviews2020

State of the art design protocol for custom made footwear for people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy.

Sicco A Bus, Jennefer B Zwaferink, Rutger Dahmen, Tessa Busch-Westbroek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diabetic foot disease: "The Times They are A Changin' ".Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sicco A BusDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8357-9163
Jennefer B ZwaferinkDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Rutger DahmenAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tessa Busch-WestbroekDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLAmsterdam Institute for Addiction Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Supported by evidence-based guidelines, custom-made footwear is often prescribed to people with diabetes who are at risk for ulceration. However, these guidelines do not specify the footwear design features, despite available scientific evidence for these features. We aimed to develop a design protocol to support custom-made footwear prescription for people with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. The population of interest was people with diabetes who are at moderate-to-high risk of developing a foot ulcer, for whom custom-made footwear (shoes and/or insoles) can be prescribed. A group of experts from rehabilitation medicine, orthopaedic shoe technology (pedorthics) and diabetic foot research, reviewed the scientific literature and met during 12 face-to-face meetings to develop a footwear design algorithm and evidence-based pressure-relief algorithm as parts of the protocol. Consensus was reached where evidence was not available. Fourteen domains of foot pathology in combination with loss of protective sensation were specified for the footwear design algorithm and for each domain shoe-specific and insole (orthosis)-specific features were defined. Most insole-related features and some shoe-related features were evidence based, whereas most shoe-related features were consensus based. The pressure-relief algorithm was evidence based using recent footwear trial data and specifically targeted patients with a healed plantar foot ulcer. These footwear design and pressure-relief algorithms are the first of their kind and should facilitate more uniform decision making in the prescription and manufacturing of adequate shoes for moderate-to-high-risk patients, reducing variation in footwear provision and improving clinical outcome in the prevention of diabetic foot ulcers.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic FootDisease ManagementHumansPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesShoescustom-made shoesdesign protocoldiabetic footfootwearperipheral neuropathyplantar pressure

Identifiers

PMID31845547
PMCPMC7154634
OpenAlexW2995334904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.