ReviewClinical cardiology2020
Integrating assessment of cognitive status in elderly cardiovascular care.
Review in Clinical cardiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cognitive assessment in heart failure: clinical value, timing, and practical tools.Heart failure reviews · 2026Review
- Practices and barriers in screening for cognitive impairment in heart failure: a clinician survey.ESC heart failure · 2026Article
- Dementia Risk in the Decade Before and After Coronary Heart Disease Diagnosis: Hybrid Case-Control and Cohort Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- The Heart-Brain Axis in the Context of Cardiovascular Disease.Physiology (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Redefining cognitive testing: the impact of cognitive reserve and sex from early to late adulthood.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Healthy ageing in older adults with cardiovascular disease.European heart journal · 2025Review
- Optimizing Cardiovascular Care in Aging Populations: A Comprehensive Review of Geriatric Cardiology.Cureus · 2025Review
- Patients reported outcome of cognitive function scale: a psychometric evaluation.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Identification of a Link between Suspected Metabolic Syndrome and Cognitive Impairment within Pharmaceutical Care in Adults over 75 Years of Age.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Heart failure and cognitive impairment: Complexity that requires a new approach.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
- The interaction and pathogenesis between cognitive impairment and common cardiovascular diseases in the elderly.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2022Review
- Integrating assessment of cognitive status in elderly cardiovascular care.Clinical cardiology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular clinicians tend to pay little attention to issues related to cognition, and yet those caring for older adults will encounter a variety of conditions that may lead to cognitive impairment. Most commonly, these include cardiovascular disease-specific conditions such as cerebrovascular disease or heart failure, but may also include neurodegenerative conditions, mood disorders, medication side effects and polypharmacy, and nutritional deficiencies and metabolic derangements among others. This review presents evidence supporting the importance of assessing cognitive status in older adults with cardiovascular disease, and suggests a practical approach to assessment and management of cognitive impairment in this population when it is found. Special attention is paid to the importance of collaboration between cardiovascular and geriatric specialists, and the value it may bring to patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.