ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
The spatiotemporal contribution of the phytoplankton community and environmental variables to the carbon sequestration potential in an urban river.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phytoplankton characterization in a tropical tidal river impacted by a megacity: the case of the Saigon River (Southern Vietnam).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The phytoplankton (internal driving forces) and environmental variables that affect complex biochemical reactions (external driving forces) play an important role in regulating photosynthetic carbon fixation. Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) exists in various phytoplankton species and is an important enzyme in the photosynthetic process. To investigate the phytoplankton composition (internal driving forces), we selected the functional gene of the Rubisco large subunit (rbcL) as the target gene for this study. Phytoplankton gross primary productivity was measured using light and dark biological oxygen demand bottles to assess the carbon sequestration potential. The fundamental environmental indicators were determined to analyze the mechanisms that drive the carbon fixation process. The correlation results indicated that green algae were only controlled by nitrate, and that diatoms were positively correlated with phosphate. The cluster analysis results demonstrated that nitrite was the major driver controlling phytoplankton primary productivity. During the wet seasons (spring and summer), the contribution of the planktonic community respiration to the carbon sequestration potential was higher than net primary productivity (NPP), followed by dissolved organic carbon and nitrate. During the dry season (autumn), NPP, total nitrogen, and nitrite ranked highest in terms of carbon sequestration potential. The contributions of green algae and diatoms to the carbon sequestration potential were temporally higher than those of cyanobacteria. The maximum carbon sequestration potential occurred during autumn because of diatom production and the function of phosphate, whereas the minimum carbon sequestration potential occurred in summer. Spatially, the upstream carbon sequestration potential was higher compared with downstream because of the effect (contribution) of cyanobacteria (Phormidium), diatoms (Surirella solea and Thalassiosira pseudonana), and environmental variable (nitrite). These findings provide a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of phytoplankton productivity and the influences of environmental variables on carbon sequestration in urban river ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.