Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845217›Full record

ReviewCurrent medical science2019

CAR T Cell Therapy for Hematological Malignancies.

Xin Yang, Gao-Xiang Wang, Jian-Feng Zhou

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current medical science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Cell-Based Therapies for Solid Tumors: Challenges and Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin YangDepartment of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Gao-Xiang WangDepartment of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Jian-Feng ZhouDepartment of Hematology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. zhougene@medmail.com.cn.
Huazhong University of Science and Technology · CNTongji Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a rapidly progressing field in oncology, the adoptive transfer of T cells that have been genetically modified with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has shown striking efficacy in the management of hematological malignancies and has been reported in a number of clinical trials. Of note, CAR T cell therapy has shown extraordinary potential, especially in relapsed/refractory patients. However, there are still challenges regarding the further development of this strategy, spanning from engineering and manufacturing issues, to limited applications, to accompanying toxicities. In this review, we will summarize the general knowledge of this novel method, including receptor composition, applications, adverse events and challenges. Additionally, we will propose several comprehensive recommendations.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicHematologic NeoplasmsHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveProtein EngineeringReceptors, Chimeric AntigenTreatment OutcomeReceptors, Chimeric Antigenchimeric antigen receptor T cellshematological malignanciesimmune therapy

Identifiers

PMID31845217
OpenAlexW2995982522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.