Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845215›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2020

Prescription of Valproate-Containing Medicines in Women of Childbearing Potential who have Psychiatric Disorders: Is It Worth the Risk?

David S Baldwin, Hugo J F Amaro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Multiscale Heterogeneity of White Matter Morphometry in Psychiatric Disorders.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The valproate prescription pattern for female mental healthcare users of reproductive age.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David S BaldwinClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. dsb1@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3343-0907
Hugo J F AmaroClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Valproate-containing medicines have long been used in psychiatric practice, principally in the treatment of acute manic episodes, as augmentation agents in the treatment of bipolar and unipolar depressive episodes, and in the prophylaxis of bipolar affective disorder. Many babies are still being born with the adverse consequences of valproate exposure in utero, which include congenital malformations, neurodevelopmental delay, and increased risks of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder. Previous measures designed to better inform women about the risks associated with valproate have not been sufficiently effective. This review highlights recent recommendations from influential regulatory and advisory bodies, summarises the relative efficacy and tolerability of valproate preparations in the psychiatric conditions for which they have often been prescribed, and offers practical guidance for the withdrawal and replacement of valproate-containing medicines in women with psychiatric disorders.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsFemaleHumansMental DisordersPrescription DrugsValproic AcidWomenAnticonvulsantsPrescription DrugsValproic Acid

Identifiers

PMID31845215
OpenAlexW2996417520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.