Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845165›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2020

Niche-related outcomes after caesarean section and quality of life: a focus group study and review of literature.

Sanne I Stegwee, Astrid Beij, Robert A de Leeuw, Lidwine B Mokkink, Lucet F van der Voet, Judith A F Huirne

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05777837 (Laparoscopic Excision Versus Combined Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Repair Without Excision of Large Cesarean Scar Niche), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05777837 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Laparoscopic Excision Versus Combined Hysteroscopic and Laparoscopic Repair Without Excision of Large Cesarean Scar Niche: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZagazig UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsCesarean Scar NicheArmslaparoscopic repair of cesarean scar niche, Combined hysteroscopic and laparoscopic repair of cesarean scar niche
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Mode of delivery and maternal sexual wellbeing: A longitudinal study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2022
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Comparative Study of USG and MRI in Evaluation of Isthmocele.Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanne I StegweeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.stegwee@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1353-5576
Astrid BeijDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert A de LeeuwDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-7754
Lidwine B MokkinkDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6489-2827
Lucet F van der VoetDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Deventer Hospital, Nico Bolkesteinlaan 75, 7416 SE, Deventer, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5389-646X
Judith A F HuirneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j.huirne@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-2677
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLDeventer Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA niche in the uterus, present in 60% of women after caesarean section (CS), is associated with several gynaecological symptoms and possibly with subfertility. Studies that focus on quality of life (QoL) in relation to a niche are lacking. PURPOSE: To identify niche-related outcomes that influence QoL and to compare patient-reported outcomes with outcomes studied in the literature.

methodsTwo focus group discussions (FGDs, N = 8 and 5) were conducted in Amsterdam UMC-location VUmc. Participants were Dutch patients with a large niche, with (planned) surgical treatment for their symptoms. Niche-related symptoms and impact on functioning or participation were fixed topics. The transcripts of the FGDs were coded into outcomes, themes and domains of QoL according to the WHOQOL model. Additionally, participants created a top five important outcomes. Next, we performed a systematic review (SR) on niche-related outcomes and compared the FGDs with niche-related outcomes from the SR.

resultsIn four domains (physical health, psychological domain, social relationships and environment), fifteen themes were reported in the FGDs. Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), subfertility, sexual activity, abdominal pain and self-esteem were themes prioritised by participants. In the literature, gynaecological symptoms and reproductive outcomes were predominantly studied. Sexuality and self-esteem were prioritised in the FGDs but hardly or never studied in the literature.

conclusionWe found a broad range of niche-related outcomes influencing QoL. Apart from symptoms evaluated in the literature such as AUB, abdominal pain and subfertility, clinicians and researchers should be more aware of sexual activity and self-esteem in this population.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAdultCesarean SectionCicatrixFemaleFocus GroupsHealth SurveysHumansInfertility, FemaleMetrorrhagiaNetherlandsPregnancyQuality of LifeSelf ConceptSexual BehaviorUterusCaesarean sectionChronic diseaseFocus groupsNicheQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID31845165
PMCPMC7142042
OpenAlexW2996550326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.