Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845144›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020

Complications of Percutaneous Drainage in Step-Up Approach for Management of Pancreatic Necrosis: Experience of 10 Years from a Tertiary Care Center.

Rajesh Gupta, Aditya Kulkarni, Raghavendra Babu, Sunil Shenvi, Rahul Gupta, Gopal Sharma, Mandeep Kang, Ujjwal Gorsi, Surinder Singh Rana

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Percutaneous Biopsy and Drainage of the Pancreas.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Reply to Letter to Editor-"Catheter-Related Complications of Percutaneous Drainage in Step-up Approach for Management of Pancreatic Necrosis".Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  16. Catheter-Related Complications of Percutaneous Drainage in Step-up Approach for Management of Pancreatic Necrosis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison of endoscopicEndoscopic ultrasound
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rajesh GuptaDivision of Surgical Gastroenterology, Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. rajsarakshi@gmail.com.
Aditya KulkarniDivision of Surgical Gastroenterology, Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Raghavendra BabuDivision of Surgical Gastroenterology, Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Sunil ShenviDivision of Surgical Gastroenterology, Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Rahul GuptaDivision of Surgical Gastroenterology, Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Gopal SharmaDivision of Surgical Gastroenterology, Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Mandeep KangDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Ujjwal GorsiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis and Imaging, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Surinder Singh RanaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPercutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) as initial intervention in necrotizing pancreatitis has led to improved outcomes and obviated need for surgery in a significant proportion. However, there can be difficulty in accessing deep-seated necrotic collections by percutaneous catheter and complications are likely.

methodsThe present study involves a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients with necrotizing pancreatitis managed by a step-up approach. All patients who underwent PCD were studied for catheter-related complications.

resultsA total of 707 PCD catheters were used in 314 patients (median 2, interquartile range IQR 1-3). The total number of interventions were 1194 (median 3, IQR 2-5). Enteric communication was seen in 8.9%, of which colonic fistula occurred in 71.4%, duodenal in 17.8%, and jejunal in 10.7% of patients. Majority (78.5%) of the fistulae were managed conservatively by withdrawal of the drain. Operative management was required in 30% of colonic and 40% of duodenal fistulae. Need for surgery, length of hospital stay, and mortality were not significantly different between patients with and without fistulae. Bleeding complications were seen in 7.3% of patients, out of which 34.7% were managed conservatively, 21.7% required angioembolization of pseudo-aneurysms, and 34.7% needed surgery. Patients with bleeding had significantly higher requirement for surgery and mechanical ventilation compared to those with no bleeding. There was no significant increase in hospital stay, ICU stay, and mortality.

conclusionHollow viscus and vascular injuries are important complications seen with catheter drainage of necrotic collections. Majority of patients with enteric communication were managed conservatively, with no added morbidity or mortality. Bleeding complications related to PCD had higher requirement for surgical intervention, but mortality rates remained similar to those of patients with no bleeding complications.

Indexed as

Pancreatitis, Acute NecrotizingDrainageHumansRetrospective StudiesTertiary Care CentersTreatment OutcomeBleeding complicationsCT scan guidanceInfected pancreatic necrosis, Sterile pancreatic necrosisIntestinal fistulaNecrotizing pancreatitisPercutaneous catheter drainagePseudoaneurysmsUltrasound guidance

Identifiers

PMID31845144
OpenAlexW2995389930

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.