Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845137›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2020

Calling Behavior and Sex Pheromone Release and Storage in the Moth Chloridea virescens.

Stephen P Foster, Karin G Anderson, Jérôme Casas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen P FosterDepartment of Entomology, SNRS, North Dakota State University, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA. stephen.foster@ndsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4760-8390
Karin G AndersonDepartment of Entomology, SNRS, North Dakota State University, PO Box 6050, Fargo, ND, 58108-6050, USA.
Jérôme CasasInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, IRBI-UMR CNRS 7261, Université de Tours, 37200, Tours, France.
North Dakota State University · USUniversité de Tours · FR

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2015-07238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female moths release sex pheromone to attract mates. In most species, sex pheromone is produced in, and released from, a specific gland. In a previous study, we used empirical data and compartmental modeling to account for the major pheromone gland processes of female Chloridea virescens: synthesis, storage, catabolism and release; we found that females released little (20-30%) of their pheromone, with most catabolized. The recent publication of a new pheromone collection method led us to reinvestigate pheromone release and catabolism in C. virescens on the basis that our original study might have underestimated release rate (thereby overestimating catabolism) due to methodology and females not calling (releasing) continuously. Further we wished to compare pheromone storage/catabolism between calling and non-calling females. First, we observed calling intermittency of females. Then, using decapitated females, we used the new collection method, along with compartmental modeling, gland sampling and stable isotope labeling, to determine differences in pheromone release, catabolism and storage between (forced) simulated calling and non-calling females. We found, (i) intact 1 d females call intermittently; (ii) pheromone is released at a higher rate than previously determined, with simulations estimating that continuously calling females release ca. 70% of their pheromone (only 30% catabolized); (iii) extension (calling)/retraction of the ovipositor is a highly effective "on/off' mechanism for release; (iv) both calling and non-calling females store most pheromone on or near the gland surface, but calling females catabolize less pheromone; (v) females are capable of producing and releasing pheromone very rapidly. Thus, not only is the moth pheromone gland efficient, in terms of the proportion of pheromone released Vs. catabolized, but it is highly effective at shutting on/off a high flux of pheromone for release.

Indexed as

Sexual Behavior, AnimalAldehydesAnimalsCarbon IsotopesFemaleGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGlucoseIsotope LabelingMaleMothsScent GlandsSex Attractants11-hexadecenalAldehydesCarbon-13Carbon IsotopesGlucoseSex AttractantsBiosynthesisCatabolismLepidopteraMass isotopomer distribution analysisPheromone glandTiter

Identifiers

PMID31845137
OpenAlexW2995970418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.