Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845120›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2020

Pig Exposure and Health Outcomes in Hospitalized Infectious Disease Patients in Vietnam.

Gail Robertson, Meghan Perry, Phat Voong Vinh, Dung Tran Thi Ngoc, Tam Pham Thi Thanh, Phuc Tran My, Huong Dang Thao, Maia Rabaa, Stephen Baker, Mark Woolhouse and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Gail RobertsonSchool of Mathematics, James Clerk Maxwell Building, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Gail.Robertson@ed.ac.uk.
Meghan PerryEpidemiology Research Group, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Phat Voong VinhThe Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Dung Tran Thi NgocThe Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Tam Pham Thi ThanhThe Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Phuc Tran MyThe Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Huong Dang ThaoThe Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Maia RabaaThe Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Stephen BakerThe Hospital for Tropical Diseases, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Mark WoolhouseUsher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Ashworth Laboratories, King's Buildings, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
VIZIONS consortium
Oxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNUniversity of Edinburgh · GBHospital for Tropical Diseases · VN

Funding

Wellcome Trust 093724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many infectious diseases have a zoonotic origin, and several have had major public health implications. Contact with animals is a known risk factor for zoonotic infections, although there are limited data on disease symptoms and pathogens associated with contact with different animal species. The rise in pig production in Southeast Asia has contributed to the emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic infections caused by contact with pigs and pig products. To compare the symptom and pathogen profiles of hospitalized patients with and without pig contact, we collected data on disease symptoms, infecting pathogens, and animal contact behaviour from patients attending six hospitals across Vietnam between 2012 and 2016. Patients who had previous contact with pigs were more likely to have enteric disease than respiratory or central nervous system infections and were more likely to grow Escherichia coli and Shigella from stool culture than those without pig contact. Patients with enteric infections who kept pigs were also more likely to have a disease of unknown origin. Public health initiatives that account for differences in animal contact behaviours and offer more comprehensive diagnostics in high-risk individuals are needed if emergence and re-emergence of zoonotic disease is to be monitored and prevented.

Indexed as

AnimalsCommunicable DiseasesEscherichia coliHumansOutcome Assessment, Health CarePublic HealthShigellaSwineSwine DiseasesVietnamZoonosesDisease of unknown originEscherichia coliPigsShigellaSoutheast AsiaVietnamZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID31845120
PMCPMC7109191
OpenAlexW2996066170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.