Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845105›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2020

Crossmodal learning of target-context associations: When would tactile context predict visual search?

Siyi Chen, Zhuanghua Shi, Xuelian Zang, Xiuna Zhu, Leonardo Assumpção, Hermann J Müller, Thomas Geyer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Siyi ChenGeneral and Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Leopoldstr 13, 80802, Munich, Germany. siyi.chen@psy.lmu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3090-6183
Zhuanghua ShiGeneral and Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Leopoldstr 13, 80802, Munich, Germany.
Xuelian ZangCenter for Cognition and Brain Disorders, Institute of Psychological Sciences, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiuna ZhuGeneral and Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Leopoldstr 13, 80802, Munich, Germany.
Leonardo AssumpçãoGeneral and Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Leopoldstr 13, 80802, Munich, Germany.
Hermann J MüllerGeneral and Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Leopoldstr 13, 80802, Munich, Germany.
Thomas GeyerGeneral and Experimental Psychology, Department of Psychology, LMU Munich, Leopoldstr 13, 80802, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEHangzhou Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well established that statistical learning of visual target locations in relation to constantly positioned visual distractors facilitates visual search. In the present study, we investigated whether such a contextual-cueing effect would also work crossmodally, from touch onto vision. Participants responded to the orientation of a visual target singleton presented among seven homogenous visual distractors. Four tactile stimuli, two to different fingers of each hand, were presented either simultaneously with or prior to the visual stimuli. The identity of the stimulated fingers provided the crossmodal context cue: in half of the trials, a given visual target location was consistently paired with a given tactile configuration. The visual stimuli were presented above the unseen fingers, ensuring spatial correspondence between vision and touch. We found no evidence of crossmodal contextual cueing when the two sets of items (tactile, visual) were presented simultaneously (Experiment 1). However, a reliable crossmodal effect emerged when the tactile distractors preceded the onset of visual stimuli 700 ms (Experiment 2). But crossmodal cueing disappeared again when, after an initial learning phase, participants flipped their hands, making the tactile distractors appear at different positions in external space while their somatotopic positions remained unchanged (Experiment 3). In all experiments, participants were unable to explicitly discriminate learned from novel multisensory arrays. These findings indicate that search-facilitating context memory can be established across vision and touch. However, in order to guide visual search, the (predictive) tactile configurations must be remapped from their initial somatotopic into a common external representational format.

Indexed as

TouchTouch PerceptionAttentionCuesHandHumansMaleReaction TimeVisual PerceptionContextual cueingCrossmodalPlasticityStatistical learningTactile processingVisual search

Identifiers

PMID31845105
PMCPMC7297845
OpenAlexW2996263504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.