Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31845091›Full record

ReviewLa Radiologia medica2020

European trends in radiology: investigating factors affecting the number of examinations and the effective dose.

Hamidreza Masjedi, Mohammad Hosein Zare, Neda Keshavarz Siahpoush, Seid Kazem Razavi-Ratki, Fatemeh Alavi, Masoud Shabani

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Can clinicians identify community-acquired pneumonia on ultralow-dose CT? A diagnostic accuracy study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. X-ray scatter in projection radiography.Radiation protection dosimetry · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hamidreza MasjediDepartment of Medical Physics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Mohammad Hosein ZareDepartment of Medical Physics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. mhzare2009@gmail.com.
Neda Keshavarz SiahpoushDepartment of Medical Physics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Seid Kazem Razavi-RatkiDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Fatemeh AlaviDepartment of Medical Physics, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Masoud ShabaniDepartment of Radiotherapy, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advances in technology have led to a growing trend in population exposure to radiation emerging from the invention of high-dose procedures. It is, for example, estimated that annually 1.2% of cancers are induced by radiological scans in Norway. This study aims to investigate and discuss the frequency and dose trends of radiological examinations in Europe. European Commission (EC) launched projects to gain information for medical exposures in 2004 and 2011. In this study, the European Commission Radiation Protection (RP) reports No. 154 and 180 have been reviewed. The RP 154 countries' data were extracted from both reports, and the average variation trend of the number of examinations and effective doses were studied. According to the results, plain radiography and fluoroscopy witnessed a reduction in the frequency and effective dose per examination. Nevertheless, European collective dose encountered an average increase of 23%, which resulted from a growing tendency for implementation of high-dose procedures such as CT scans and interventional examinations. It is worth noting that most of the CT procedures have undergone an increase in effective dose per examination. Although demand and dose per examination in some radiological procedures (such as intravenous urography (IVU) have been reduced, population collective dose is still rising due to the increasing demand for CT scan procedures. Even though the individual risks are not considerable, it can, in a large scale, threaten the health of the people at the present time. Due to this fact, better justification should be addressed so as to reduce population exposure.

Indexed as

EuropeFluoroscopyHumansNeoplasms, Radiation-InducedNorwayRadiation DosageRadiation ExposureRadiation ProtectionRadiographyRadiography, InterventionalRadiologyTomography, X-Ray ComputedDoseRadiographyRadiologyTrends

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.