ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2020
[Development of a learning target index for ophthalmology].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [DOG-EyeTeacher: a response by the Teaching Association to the medical study restructuring].Die Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
- [The "Nationaler Kompetenzbasierter Lernzielkatalog Medizin NKLM 2.0"-Implications for medical education in ophthalmology].Die Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- [Online examination course instead of classroom teaching: adaptation of medical student teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022Article
- [Ophthalmic emergencies: training via interactive key feature cases for medical students].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022Article
- ["Flipped classroom"-A future concept for student teaching in ophthalmology?]Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFuture developments of teaching in human medicine and ophthalmology emphasize the need of a learning target index to standardize and modernize education at German universities. The first measure is the elaboration of a learning target index of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG).
methodThe masterplan medicine 2020 has been passed by German authorities in 2017 to restructure studies in human medicine at German universities according to a concept of skill-related learning objectives rather than based on factual knowledge. The executive committee of the DOG, together with all subsections, accepted the first version of the learning target index elaborated by the authors on 30 May 2016.
resultsThe learning target index for ophthalmology encompasses 25 chapters, whereby chapter 1 is dedicated to the investigation methods and treatment. Chapters 2-23 deal with the diseases and are subdivided according to definition and leading symptoms, pathogenesis as well as diagnostics and treatment. To correspond to the need to focus on core items individual chapters are introduced for glaucoma, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration and retinal detachment. Differential diagnoses and main symptoms are dealt with in chapter 24, the epidemiology and causes of blindness in chapter 25. The depths of competence are presented for the groups of all students and the practical competence (depth of competence 3) is dealt with separately for semester students and students in the practical year.
conclusionThis learning target index for ophthalmology is the first approved by the DOG and represents a first step to further improve medical education in ophthalmology at German universities. The new teaching standards for studies in human medicine related to the masterplan medicine 2020 reflect the need of a consented approach to improve educational standards in ophthalmology so that all topics in ophthalmology remains sufficiently represented despite the specification to focus on high priority core items.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31844928What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.