Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844906›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2020

Comparison of multimedia and printed patient education tools for patients with osteoporosis: a 6-month randomized controlled trial.

M A Lopez-Olivo, J K A des Bordes, H Lin, T Rizvi, R J Volk, M E Suarez-Almazor

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01698762 (IADAPT-Third Phase), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01698762 completednot on this map

IADAPT-Third Phase

TypeobservationalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2013 to 2021Enrolled676ConditionsMusculoskeletal DiseasesArmsMultimedia Patient Decision Aids (MM-PtDAs), Comparative Effectiveness Research Summary Guide (CERSG), Questionnaires
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality and effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment decision aids: a systematic review and environmental scan.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of health education on treatment adherence, dietary supplement use, and disease health knowledge among people with osteoporosis: a meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

M A Lopez-OlivoDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5165-8393
J K A des BordesDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, The University of Texas McGovern Medical School, 6431 Fannin St, Houston, 77030, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-8117
H LinDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, 77030, TX, USA.
T RizviHouston Rheumatology & Arthritis Specialists, Memorial Hermann, 23920 Katy Freeway, Katy, 77494, TX, USA.
R J VolkDepartment of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8811-5854
M E Suarez-AlmazorDepartment of General Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, 77030, TX, USA. msalmazor@mdanderson.org.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5381-5797
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USMemorial Hermann · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 1R18HS019354-03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of adding a video tool to a printed booklet on osteoporosis. Both strategies were effective in increasing knowledge and decreasing decisional conflict. There was no difference in the measured outcomes between the intervention and control groups. Patient preferences and learning styles are key factors in deciding a presentation format when educating patients with osteoporosis.

introductionInnovative approaches to patient education about self-management in osteoporosis may improve outcomes.

methodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of adding a multimedia patient education tool involving video modeling to a printed educational booklet on osteoporosis. Participants were post-menopausal women with osteoporosis. We assessed osteoporosis knowledge, decisional conflict, self-efficacy, and effectiveness in disease management at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and at 3 and 6 months. Linear regression models were used to explore changes in outcomes at 6 months with respect to baseline characteristics.

resultsTwo hundred and twenty-five women were randomized, 111 to receive the multimedia tool in addition to the booklet and 114 to receive the booklet alone. Knowledge and decisional conflict scores significantly improved in both groups at all post-intervention assessment points, but with no significant differences in score changes between the groups. Self-efficacy and disease management effectiveness showed no significant changes from baseline. In the entire cohort, younger age was associated with better effectiveness in disease management and Hispanic women had greater gains in knowledge at 6 months compared to White women. Women with limited health literacy who had received the multimedia tool in addition to the printed materials had higher decisional conflict than those who received printed materials alone.

conclusionBoth multimedia and printed tools increased knowledge and decreased decisional conflict to the same extent, neither of the educational materials proved to be better than the other. For women with limited health literacy, receiving the booklet alone was more effective in reducing decisional conflict after 6 months, than adding the multimedia tool.

Indexed as

MultimediaOsteoporosisFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantPamphletsPatient Education as TopicPatient PreferenceEducation interventionOsteoporosisPatient educationPostmenopausal womenRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID31844906
OpenAlexW2996513591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.