Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844890›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2020

A randomized controlled phase III study of VB-111 combined with bevacizumab vs bevacizumab monotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GLOBE).

Timothy F Cloughesy, Andrew Brenner, John F de Groot, Nicholas A Butowski, Leor Zach, Jian L Campian, Benjamin M Ellingson, Laurence S Freedman, Yael C Cohen, Noa Lowenton-Spier and 4 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02511405 (A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Arm, Open-Label, Multi-center Study of VB-111 Combined With Bevacizumab vs. Bevacizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02511405 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled, Double-Arm, Open-Label, Multi-center Study of VB-111 Combined With Bevacizumab vs. Bevacizumab Monotherapy in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorVascular Biogenics Ltd. operating as VBL TherapeuticsRan2015 to 2018Enrolled252ConditionsGlioblastomaArmsVB-111 + bevacizumab, Bevacizumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Convection enhanced delivery of Rhenium (Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 20 institutions in 3 countries.

Timothy F CloughesyDepartment of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Andrew BrennerUniversity of Texas Health San Antonio Cancer Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
John F de GrootDepartment of Neuro-Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Nicholas A ButowskiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Leor ZachOncology Institute, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel.
Jian L CampianDivision of Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Benjamin M EllingsonUCLA Brain Tumor Imaging Laboratory, Center for Computer Vision and Imaging Biomarkers, Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Laurence S FreedmanBiostatistics and Biomathematics Unit, Gertner Institute for Epidemiology and Health Policy Research, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel HaShomer, Israel.
Yael C CohenVBL Therapeutics, Modi'in, Israel.
Noa Lowenton-SpierVBL Therapeutics, Modi'in, Israel.
Tamar Rachmilewitz MineiVBL Therapeutics, Modi'in, Israel.
Shifra Fain ShmueliVBL Therapeutics, Modi'in, Israel.
GLOBE Study Investigators
Patrick Y WenCenter for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USVascular Biogenics (Israel) · ILSheba Medical Center · ILThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor University · USCenter for Neuro-Oncology · USColorado Neurological Institute · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USDartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center · USHenry Ford Health System · USNorthwestern University · USOrlando Health · USOttawa Hospital · CARambam Health Care Campus · ILSunnybrook Health Science Centre · CASUNY Upstate Medical University · USTexas Oncology · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Louisville · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
UCLA SPORE in Brain CancerP50CA211015 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Yvonne Yu-Hsuan Chen · 2017 to 2026
$25.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA211015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOfranergene obadenovec (VB-111) is an anticancer viral therapy that demonstrated in a phase II study a survival benefit for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) who were primed with VB-111 monotherapy that was continued after progression with concomitant bevacizumab.

methodsThis pivotal phase III randomized, controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of upfront combination of VB-111 and bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive VB-111 1013 viral particles every 8 weeks in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (combination arm) or bevacizumab monotherapy (control arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsEnrolled were 256 patients at 57 sites. Median exposure to VB-111 was 4 months. The study did not meet its primary or secondary goals. Median OS was 6.8 versus 7.9 months in the combination versus control arm (hazard ratio, 1.20; 95% CI: 0.91-1.59; P = 0.19) and ORR was 27.3% versus 21.9% (P = 0.26). A higher rate of grades 3-5 adverse events was reported in the combination arm (67% vs 40%), mainly attributed to a higher rate of CNS and flu-like/fever events. Trends for improved survival with combination treatment were seen in the subgroup of patients with smaller tumors and in patients who had a posttreatment febrile reaction.

conclusionsIn this study, upfront concomitant administration of VB-111 and bevacizumab failed to improve outcomes in rGBM. Change of treatment regimen, with the lack of VB-111 monotherapy priming, may explain the differences from the favorable phase II results. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02511405.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAngiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabHumansProgression-Free SurvivalTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsBevacizumabanti-angiogenesisgene therapyglioblastomaVB-111viral immuno-oncology

Identifiers

PMID31844890
PMCPMC7229248
OpenAlexW2995532498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.