ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology2019
Impact of quality assurance on utilization of corneal tissues in a community Eye Bank.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Stages and costs of processing donated corneas for transplantation in eye banks: a scoping review.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Article
- Indian eye banking at crossroads: From volume to value.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Loss of quality of corneas stored in hypothermic preservation media during processing and evaluation in an eye bank: a cohort study.Cell and tissue banking · 2026Article
- Trends in Corneal Transplantation and Characteristics of Donors in the Chongqing Eye Bank, China: A Retrospective Study, 1999-2018.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the linkage between Quality Assurance Program (QAP) and increase in utilization of donor corneas at a community Eye Bank.
methodsA donor cornea is defined as utilized when it is used for cornea transplant. Two metrics, utilization rate (UR) and non-utilization rate (NUR), were defined. The Eye Bank implemented QAP from 2011. As a part of QAP, detailed gap analysis of tissue utilization was performed. Four major categories causing non-utilization of recovered corneas were identified. These categories were poor "Tissue Quality", "Seropositive" donor blood sample, "Medical History" of donor, and donor "Blood Sample Issues." The years 2008-2011 were labelled the pre-intervention period, and the years 2012-2017 were labelled the post-intervention period. Annual UR and annual NUR for the four categories of non-utilization from the pre and the post-intervention periods were statistically compared.
resultsIn the pre-intervention period, the Eye Bank recovered 1425 donor corneas in total and transplanted 762. In the post-intervention period, the Eye Bank recovered 6661 corneas in total and transplanted 4393. The UR improved from 53.47% (762/1425) in the pre-intervention period to 65.95% (4393/6661) in the post-intervention period (
conclusionsThe study indicates that QAP improves UR of recovered corneas. In countries with a shortage of donor corneas, increasing utilization of recovered corneas can lead to an increase in corneal transplants. Implementation of QAP at the Eye Bank can be a means of achieving this outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.