Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844733›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2019

Mesenchymal stem cell-based bone tissue engineering for veterinary practice.

Sirirat Nantavisai, Hiroshi Egusa, Thanaphum Osathanon, Chenphop Sawangmake

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Shape Memory Polymer Scaffolds-Utility for In Vitro Osteogenesis of Canine Multipotent Stromal Cells.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Biodegradable Polymers in Veterinary Medicine-A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Discussing the final size and shape of the reconstructed tissues in tissue engineering.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sirirat NantavisaiVeterinary Stem Cell and Bioengineering Innovation Center (VSCBIC), Veterinary Pharmacology and Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Hiroshi EgusaDivision of Molecular and Regenerative Prosthodontics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.
Thanaphum OsathanonDepartment of Anatomy and Center of Excellence for Regenerative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Chenphop SawangmakeVeterinary Stem Cell and Bioengineering Innovation Center (VSCBIC), Veterinary Pharmacology and Stem Cell Research Laboratory, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue engineering has been widely studied and proposed as a promising platform for correcting the bone defects. The applications of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-based bone tissue engineering have been investigated in various

Indexed as

Biomedical engineeringBone tissue engineeringCanineMesenchymal stem cellsStem cell researchVeterinary medicine

Identifiers

PMID31844733
PMCPMC6895744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.