Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844692›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2019

Antidengue potential of leaf extracts of

T Pratheeba, V Taranath, Dvr Sai Gopal, D Natarajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An Overview of Zika Virus and Zika Virus Induced Neuropathies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Role of phytocompounds as the potential anti-viral agent: an overview.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. The Current Landscape of Bioactive Molecules against DENV: A Systematic Review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Phytoconstituents as Lead Compounds for Anti-Dengue Drug Discovery.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T PratheebaNatural Drug Research Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences, Periyar University, Salem, 636 011, Tamil Nadu, India.
V TaranathDepartment of Virology, SVU College of Sciences, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, 517502, Andra Pradesh, India.
Dvr Sai GopalDepartment of Virology, SVU College of Sciences, Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, 517502, Andra Pradesh, India.
D NatarajanNatural Drug Research Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology, School of Biosciences, Periyar University, Salem, 636 011, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to screen the anti-dengue potential of crude leaf extracts of two plants from

Indexed as

Aedes aegyptiAntiviral activityBiotechnologyMedicinal plantsPhytochemicalPlant biologySpectral study (GCMS & FT-IR)VirologyZoology

Identifiers

PMID31844692
PMCPMC6889234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.