ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2019
Group based video-conferencing for adults with depression: findings from a user-led qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03288506 (Developing E-health Services), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Developing E-health Services (DES): The Feasibility and Acceptability of Group Based Video-conferencing for Adults With Depression
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing research priorities for palliative care in Colombia: a priority setting partnership approach.BMC palliative care · 2024Article
- 'Getting involved in research': a co-created, co-delivered and co-analysed course for those with lived experience of health and social care services.Research involvement and engagement · 2022Article
- An exercise intervention for people with serious mental illness: Findings from a qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Group based video-conferencing for adults with depression: findings from a user-led qualitative data analysis using participatory theme elicitation.Research involvement and engagement · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccessing support services for depression has been historically difficult given the societal stigma that exists regarding the condition. Recent advances in digital technologies continue to be postulated as a potential panacea yet the results from research trials have been mixed with a range of effect sizes.
methodsThis article offers a different perspective by presenting a panel of end users (co-researchers) with qualitative interview data (
resultsCo-researchers reported that while VC based interventions appeared convenient, accessible and relatively low cost - additional training and support should be offered to improve uptake and retention. In addition, co-researchers suggested that further exploration is needed regarding the level of self-awareness one feels in a group based VC environment and whether this facilitates disclosure (through disinhibition) or increases anxiety.
conclusionThe findings presented here appear to support existing (researcher and academic-led) literature in the field as well as suggest new areas for investigation. By presenting data generated solely by co-researchers, this article also adds to the evidence surrounding participatory analysis methods - particularly the growing need for robust approaches that are accessible and less time-consuming than those currently available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03288506 (Clinicaltrials.gov) 20th Sept 2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03288506.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.