Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844175›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2020

Dwarna: a blockchain solution for dynamic consent in biobanking.

Nicholas Mamo, Gillian M Martin, Maria Desira, Bridget Ellul, Jean-Paul Ebejer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Integrating population-based biobanks: Catalyst for advances in precision health.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas MamoCentre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5452-5548
Gillian M MartinCentre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5281-8117
Maria DesiraCentre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8465-4842
Bridget EllulDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4146-0663
Jean-Paul EbejerCentre for Molecular Medicine and Biobanking, Biomedical Sciences Building, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2080, Malta. jean.p.ebejer@um.edu.mt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-2637

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic consent aims to empower research partners and facilitate active participation in the research process. Used within the context of biobanking, it gives individuals access to information and control to determine how and where their biospecimens and data should be used. We present Dwarna-a web portal for 'dynamic consent' that acts as a hub connecting the different stakeholders of the Malta Biobank: biobank managers, researchers, research partners, and the general public. The portal stores research partners' consent in a blockchain to create an immutable audit trail of research partners' consent changes. Dwarna's structure also presents a solution to the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation's right to erasure-a right that is seemingly incompatible with the blockchain model. Dwarna's transparent structure increases trustworthiness in the biobanking process by giving research partners more control over which research studies they participate in, by facilitating the withdrawal of consent and by making it possible to request that the biospecimen and associated data are destroyed.

Indexed as

BlockchainBiological Specimen BanksGenetic PrivacyGenetics, MedicalHumansInformed ConsentSoftwareStakeholder Participation

Identifiers

PMID31844175
PMCPMC7170942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.