Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844129›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2019

Zika virus infection in pregnancy and infant growth, body composition in the first three months of life: a cohort study.

Fernanda Soares, Andrea D Abranches, Letícia Villela, Sarah Lara, Daniele Araújo, Sylvia Nehab, Leila Silva, Yasmin Amaral, Saint Clair G Junior, Sheila Pone and 7 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Fernanda SoaresInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Andrea D AbranchesInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Letícia VillelaInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sarah LaraInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Daniele AraújoInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sylvia NehabInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Leila SilvaInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Yasmin AmaralInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8159-0564
Saint Clair G JuniorInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sheila PoneInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ludmila LobkowiczDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nuria Sanchez ClementeDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Patricia BrasilInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Karin Nielsen-SainesUniversidade da California -Pediatric Infectious Disease, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1742-5211
Marcos PoneInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Elizabeth BrickleyDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Maria Elisabeth MoreiraInstituto Fernandes Figueira/Instituto Nacional de Infectologia - Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. bebethiff@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2034-0294

Funding

Genetic evolution, pathogenesis and immune responses in mother to child transmission of ZIKVR01AI140718 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI CHENG, GENHONG, JUNG, JAE U · 2018 to 2022
$3.8M
Viral kinetics, immunity and transmission of ZIKV: an exploratory analysis in preparation for vaccine developmentR21AI129534 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BRASIL, PATRICIA, NIELSEN, KARIN · 2017 to 2018
$378k
Opthalmic Manifestations of Congenital Zika Virus InfectionR21EY028318 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BRASIL, PATRICIA, NIELSEN, KARIN · 2017 to 2018
$373k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY028318NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI140718NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI129534Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 205377/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implications of Zika Virus exposure in pregnancy for early infant growth remains poorly described. The main goal of this study is to compare the growth, body composition, and feeding modality of infants in the first three months of life by prenatal Zika Virus exposure status. We selected an analytical cohort of 115 infants born without microcephaly, comprising 56 infants with qRT-PCR confirmed exposure to ZIKV during gestation and 59 infants born to women with presumptively no evidence of ZIKV in pregnancy. Infants were evaluated at birth, 1 and 3 months of age in terms of anthropometrics, body composition All the results were adjusted by maternal age, maternal BMI and gestational age. We observe no differences between anthropometric measurements at birth. Mothers in exposed group showed higher BMI. At 1 month and 3 months of age there were differences in mid arm circumference, arm muscle circumference and fat free mass. Weight and length was less in the ZIKV exposed in pregnancy infants and statistically different at 3 month of age. The findings of this investigation provide new evidence that ZIKV exposure in pregnancy may be associated with differences in body composition.

Indexed as

AdultBody CompositionBody WeightCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMicrocephalyPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousProspective StudiesZika VirusZika Virus Infection

Identifiers

PMID31844129
PMCPMC6915782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.