Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31844128›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Postmenopause as a key factor in the composition of the Endometrial Cancer Microbiome (ECbiome).

Dana M Walsh, Alexis N Hokenstad, Jun Chen, Jaeyun Sung, Gregory D Jenkins, Nicholas Chia, Heidi Nelson, Andrea Mariani, Marina R S Walther-Antonio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Microbiome impacts quality of life in patients with endometrial cancer and benign gynecological conditions.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dana M WalshMicrobiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8919-0079
Alexis N HokenstadDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jun ChenMicrobiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jaeyun SungMicrobiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Gregory D JenkinsDepartment of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Nicholas ChiaMicrobiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Heidi NelsonMicrobiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Andrea MarianiDivision of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. mariani.andrea@mayo.edu.
Marina R S Walther-AntonioMicrobiome Program, Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA. waltherantonio.marina@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Use of microfluidic tumor cultures to enable clinical trials of therapies for ovarian cancerP50CA136393 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Zhenkun Lou · 2009 to 2026
$37.0M
ZESTRIL VS. VERAPAMIL IN THE TREATMENT OF HYPERTENSIONM01RR000585 · NCRR · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI RIZZA, ROBERT A. · 1985 to 2006
$30.4M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002379 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI NILUFER ERTEKIN-TANER · 2017 to 2026
$14.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002379NCI NIH HHS P50 CA136393NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incidence rates for endometrial cancer (EC) are rising, particularly in postmenopausal and obese women. Previously, we showed that the uterine and vaginal microbiome distinguishes patients with EC from those without. Here, we sought to examine the impact of patient factors (such as menopause status, body mass index, and vaginal pH) in the microbiome in the absence of EC and how these might contribute to the microbiome signature in EC. We find that each factor independently alters the microbiome and identified postmenopausal status as the main driver of a polymicrobial network associated with EC (ECbiome). We identified Porphyromas somerae presence as the most predictive microbial marker of EC and we confirm this using targeted qPCR, which could be of use in detecting EC in high-risk, asymptomatic women. Given the established pathogenic behavior of P. somerae and accompanying network in tissue infections and ulcers, future investigation into their role in EC is warranted.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexEndometrial NeoplasmsEndometriumFemaleHumansMicrobiotaMiddle AgedPorphyromonasPostmenopauseRisk FactorsUterusVagina

Identifiers

PMID31844128
PMCPMC6915778
OpenAlexW2994957041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.