ArticleScientific reports2019
Parameters Influencing Cavitation Within Vials Subjected to Drop Shock.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Freeze-Dried Biopharmaceutical Formulations are Surprisingly Less Stable than Liquid Formulations during Dropping.Pharmaceutical research · 2022Article
- Secondary Packages cannot Protect Liquid Biopharmaceutical Formulations from Dropping-Induced Degradation.Pharmaceutical research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pharmaceutical industry has made improvements to mitigate protein degradation during the drug manufacturing process, storage, and transportation. However, there is less quality control after the manufacturer releases the drug. Previous research has shown that drop shock due to mishandling and accidental dropping of therapeutic vials may cause cavitation, aggregation, and particle formation. In this study, the cavitation behavior of Deionized (DI) water and 10mM L-Histidine buffer solution which were subjected to drop shock by hand dropping were investigated to study the effects of vial materials, solutions, fill volumes, drop heights, and internal vial geometries. A Phantom v7 high-speed camera was used to record images at a rate of 66,700 frames per second of the vials as they underwent drop shock. These videos were then reviewed to find the angle of impact, and to determine if there was cavitation. The results indicate that decreasing fill height by using a smaller fill volume or larger diameter vials were found to mitigate cavitation across drop heights. Secondly, results indicate there is a significant difference between the cavitation behavior of glass and plastic vials, and plastic had more cavitation cases. Lastly, there was not a significant difference in the occurrence of cavitation between DI water and L-Histidine buffer solution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.